Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026
Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation
Published on: September 4, 2017
Feasibility of CBCT-based dose calculation: comparative analysis of HU adjustment techniques
Irina Fotina1, Johannes Hopfgartner, Markus Stock
1Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University Vienna/AKH Wien, Austria. irina_fotina@hotmail.com
Background And Purpose:
The aim of this work was to compare the accuracy of different HU adjustments for CBCT-based dose calculation.
Methods And Materials:
Dose calculation was performed on CBCT images of 30 patients. In the first two approaches phantom-based (Pha-CC) and population-based (Pop-CC) conversion curves were used. The third method (WAB) represents override of the structures with standard densities for water, air and bone. In ROI mapping approach all structures were overridden with average HUs from planning CT. All techniques were benchmarked to the Pop-CC and CT-based plans by DVH comparison and γ-index analysis.
Results:
For prostate plans, WAB and ROI mapping compared to Pop-CC showed differences in PTV D(median) below 2%. The WAB and Pha-CC methods underestimated the bladder dose in IMRT plans. In lung cases PTV coverage was underestimated by Pha-CC method by 2.3% and slightly overestimated by the WAB and ROI techniques. The use of the Pha-CC method for head-neck IMRT plans resulted in difference in PTV coverage up to 5%. Dose calculation with WAB and ROI techniques showed better agreement with pCT than conversion curve-based approaches.
Conclusions:
Density override techniques provide an accurate alternative to the conversion curve-based methods for dose calculation on CBCT images.
