Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation01:08

Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation

A successful patient outcome depends mainly on the evaluation stage of the nursing process. Evaluation determines effectiveness by reviewing what was done previously after the completion of nursing interventions. Every time a healthcare professional steps in or administers treatment, they must reassess or evaluate the action to ensure the intended result. During the evaluation phase, there are three probable patient outcomes:
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A CanMEDS-Based Approach to Physician Evaluation and Performance Assessment.

Healthcare management forum·2026
Same author

Mechanical testing methods for orthopaedic research : an introduction.

Bone & joint research·2026
Same author

The design process for orthopaedic implants : an introduction.

Bone & joint research·2026
Same author

Mechanical comparison of different plate-and-screw configurations for repairing forearm diaphysis fractures: a systematic review.

European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society·2026
Same author

Where are orthopedic surgery graduates practising? A critical look at the last 30 years in Ontario.

Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie·2026
Same author

Mechanical Performance of Monoaxial Versus Polyaxial Locked Plates for Bone Fracture Repair: A Review.

Clinics in orthopedic surgery·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 20, 2026

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
10:07

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

Adjudicating outcomes: fundamentals.

Christopher Vannabouathong1, Michel Saccone, Sheila Sprague

  • 1Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, 293 Wellington Street North, Suite 110, Hamilton, ON L8L 8E7, Canada.

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume
|July 20, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Outcome adjudication, crucial for reliable clinical trial results, especially for subjective measures like fracture healing, is detailed here. This process ensures more valid assessments in orthopaedic research.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 20, 2026

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
10:07

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

Area of Science:

  • Orthopaedic surgery
  • Clinical trial methodology
  • Medical research

Background:

  • Outcome adjudication is common in clinical trials across medical disciplines but rarely reported in orthopaedics.
  • Subjective outcomes, such as fracture healing, benefit significantly from reliable and valid assessment methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide an overview of the outcome adjudication process in clinical trials.
  • To highlight the importance and complexity of implementing adjudication in orthopaedic research.
  • To discuss common challenges and best practices for outcome assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Describes the essential infrastructure required for successful adjudication, including research personnel and data collection oversight.
  • Emphasizes the critical role of a study-specific adjudication charter detailing committee roles, responsibilities, and decision rules.
  • Highlights the efficiency gains from web-based adjudication systems for timely assessments.

Main Results:

  • Outcome adjudication enhances the reliability and validity of assessments, particularly for subjective endpoints.
  • A well-defined adjudication charter and robust infrastructure are key to successful implementation.
  • Web-based platforms streamline the adjudication process, improving efficiency and timeliness.

Conclusions:

  • Outcome adjudication is a vital yet underreported process in orthopaedic clinical trials.
  • Proper implementation, guided by a charter and supported by infrastructure, ensures rigorous outcome assessment.
  • Adjudication improves the quality of evidence, especially for subjective outcomes like fracture healing.