Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

"Am I too old for a shoulder replacement?" The association between age and comorbidities on the outcomes following Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery·2026
Same author

A FeAsibility items Checklist for assessing implementation characTeristics of patient-reported Outcome measures in Research, Regulation and Routine clinical care (FACTOR3): Development and evaluation.

Clinical medicine (London, England)·2026
Same author

Less frequent clinical and viral load assessments during COVID did not increase virological failure.

International journal of STD & AIDS·2026
Same author

Staff training to improve participant recruitment into surgical randomised controlled trials: A feasibility study within a trial (SWAT) across four host trials simultaneously.

Research methods in medicine & health sciences·2026
Same author

Predictors of prolonged length of stay in shoulder arthroplasty: A study using the National Joint Registry and Hospital Episode Statistics for England.

Shoulder & elbow·2026
Same author

Measuring Value in Orthopaedics: The U.S. and U.K. Perspectives.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2026
Same journal

Do Younger Patients Undergoing Transfibular Total Ankle Arthroplasty Achieve Outcomes Comparable with Those of Older Patients? Interpreting Nonsignificant Differences in Clinical Research: Commentary on an article by Kevin A. Schafer, MD, et al.: "Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes at a Mean of 7 Years Following Primary Transfibular Total Ankle Arthroplasty in Younger and Older Patients".

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2026
Same journal

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes at a Mean of 7 Years Following Primary Transfibular Total Ankle Arthroplasty in Younger and Older Patients.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2026
Same journal

Quantifying Protrusio Risk in the Metastatic Acetabulum: A Step Toward Precision: Commentary on an article by Will Jiang, BS, et al.: "Development of a Radiographic Scoring System to Estimate Acetabular Protrusion Risk in Patients with Osteolytic Periacetabular Metastases".

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2026
Same journal

Can We Find the Oracle of Fracture Union?: Commentary on an article by Luke A. Lopas, MD, et al.: "A Fracture Healing Odyssey: Kinematic Comparison of Unions and Nonunions in Human Lower-Extremity Long Bones Treated with Intramedullary Nailing. A Retrospective Cohort Study".

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2026
Same journal

Stacked-Cone Constructs for Extensive Tibial and/or Femoral Bone Loss in Complex Primary and Revision TKA: A Multicenter Analysis of 84 Cases.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2026
Same journal

Shaping Modern Practice in South Korea: A Centennial Review of Orthopaedics at Severance Hospital and Yonsei University College of Medicine.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 20, 2026

Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface: Surgical Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial in Postamputation Pain
03:53

Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface: Surgical Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial in Postamputation Pain

Published on: March 15, 2024

Orthopaedic trial networks.

Amar Rangan1, Stephen Brealey, Andrew Carr

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The James Cook University Hospital, Marton Road, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW, United Kingdom.

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume
|July 20, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are crucial for evaluating health interventions but face challenges in funding and recruitment, especially in orthopaedics. Orthopaedic networks can overcome these hurdles by prioritizing research, training surgeons, and improving trial coordination and patient recruitment.

More Related Videos

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation: Surgical Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial in Postamputation Pain
03:26

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation: Surgical Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial in Postamputation Pain

Published on: March 8, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 20, 2026

Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface: Surgical Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial in Postamputation Pain
03:53

Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface: Surgical Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial in Postamputation Pain

Published on: March 15, 2024

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation: Surgical Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial in Postamputation Pain
03:26

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation: Surgical Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial in Postamputation Pain

Published on: March 8, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Orthopaedic Surgery Research

Background:

  • Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for evaluating health interventions but face significant barriers to implementation.
  • Surgical specialties, particularly orthopaedics, have historically contributed less to the RCT literature due to funding, complexity, and recruitment challenges.
  • Issues such as clinical equipoise and patient acceptability critically impact the success of surgical RCTs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the role of orthopaedic networks in overcoming challenges associated with conducting RCTs in orthopaedic surgery.
  • To identify strategies for improving the feasibility, efficiency, and impact of RCTs in orthopaedic clinical practice.
  • To emphasize the importance of networks in enhancing patient recruitment and fostering a research culture.

Main Methods:

  • This study reviews the challenges in conducting RCTs within orthopaedic surgery.
  • It examines the potential of orthopaedic networks (associations, societies, research networks) to facilitate RCTs.
  • The review discusses how networks can address funding, training, coordination, and dissemination issues.

Main Results:

  • Orthopaedic networks offer a viable solution to the difficulties in funding and setting up RCTs.
  • Networks can play a key role in identifying research priorities, training surgeons, and coordinating multi-center trials.
  • Leveraging networks is essential for improving patient recruitment, a critical factor for evidence generation in orthopaedics.

Conclusions:

  • Orthopaedic networks are vital for promoting a research culture and ensuring the efficient use of resources for RCTs.
  • These networks are crucial for overcoming recruitment barriers and enhancing the evidence base for orthopaedic practice.
  • Future strategies should incorporate networks to improve generalizability, foster collaboration, and increase the acceptance of trial findings.