Left ventricular chamber dimensions and wall thickness by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison with

Valentina O Puntmann1, Rolf Gebker, Simon Duckett

  • 1Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, The Rayne Institute, St. Thomas' Hospital Campus, London, UK.

Insights

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) show good agreement for left ventricular (LV) measurements. A 3-chamber (3-CH) CMR view offers superior reproducibility and concordance with TTE.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a gold standard for assessing cardiomyopathies, accurately measuring cardiac volumes and mass.
  • Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the routine first-line imaging technique for initial diagnosis and patient follow-up.
  • Direct comparison of CMR-derived left ventricular (LV) measurements with TTE is crucial for clinical practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the correspondence between CMR and TTE measurements of LV chamber dimensions and wall thickness.
  • To compare the agreement and reproducibility of different CMR views against TTE.
  • To determine the optimal CMR approach for LV assessment in comparison to TTE.

Main Methods:

  • 101 subjects underwent both TTE and CMR, categorized into normal, dilated LV cavity, and increased LV wall thickness groups.
  • Standard TTE measurements were compared with CMR values from basal short-axis and 3-chamber (3-CH) views.
  • Interstudy reproducibility of CMR measurements was assessed in a subset of subjects.

Main Results:

  • A better agreement was observed between TTE and the CMR 3-chamber (3-CH) view for all measured dimensions across all patient groups.
  • The 3-CH CMR view demonstrated superior intraobserver and interobserver agreement compared to other methods.
  • Both CMR approaches exhibited sound interstudy reproducibility for all dimensions and patient groups.

Conclusions:

  • CMR and TTE demonstrate good agreement in measuring LV dimensions and wall thickness.
  • The CMR 3-chamber (3-CH) view is proposed as a superior method due to enhanced reproducibility and closer concordance with TTE.
  • These findings support the integration of the 3-CH CMR view for more reliable LV assessment.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos