Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Diffraction correction methods for pulse-echo acoustic attenuation estimation.

I Céspedes1, J Ophir

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Texas Medical School, Houston 77030.

Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
|January 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Elastography of beef muscle.

Meat science·2011
Same author

The use of elastography to measure quality characteristics of pork semimembranosus muscle.

Meat science·2011
Same author

The anti-inflammatory target A(3) adenosine receptor is over-expressed in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis and Crohn's disease.

Cellular immunology·2009
Same author

A deconvolution filter for improvement of time-delay estimation in elastography.

IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control·2008
Same author

Multiresolution imaging in elastography.

IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control·2008
Same author

An adaptive strain estimator for elastography.

IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control·2008
Same journal

Cardiac Natural Mechanical Wave Detection and Speed Estimation Using Deep Learning-Based 2-D Ultrasound Imaging: A Feasibility Study.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026
Same journal

Region-Specific Evaluation of Plaque Segmentation in Cross-sectional Projections of Carotid Ultrasound Images Using Deep Learning Models in a Sub-clinical Atherosclerosis Cohort.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026
Same journal

Simulating the Dedifferentiation Process of Thyroid Cancer: Insights from Mouse Models and Ultrasound Imaging.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026
Same journal

A Nomogram Based on Ultrasound Features for Predicting Major Intra-Operative Hemorrhage in Patients With Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS).

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026
Same journal

MedLP-HAFB-CLIP: Hierarchical Adaptive Large Model With Learnable Medical Prompts for Level II Ultrasound Standard Plane Identification.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026
Same journal

Data Assimilating B-splines for Model-based Regularization in Ultrasound Vector Flow Imaging.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026
See all related articles

This study compares Axial Beam Translation (ABT) and Inverse Diffraction Filtering (IDF) for estimating attenuation in scattering media. ABT consistently improves accuracy, while IDF

Area of Science:

  • Medical imaging physics
  • Acoustic wave propagation

Background:

  • Accurate estimation of attenuation coefficient is crucial for quantitative ultrasound imaging.
  • Diffraction errors can significantly impact attenuation estimates in scattering media.
  • Phase aberration and scattering properties affect wave propagation and estimation accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effectiveness of Axial Beam Translation (ABT) and Inverse Diffraction Filtering (IDF) in reducing diffraction errors.
  • To evaluate the impact of phase aberration and scattering on these estimation methods.
  • To assess the reliability of ABT and IDF for attenuation coefficient estimation.

Main Methods:

  • Computer simulations of wave propagation in scattering media.
  • Water tank experiments using a plane transducer.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Implementation and comparison of ABT and IDF algorithms.
  • Analysis of estimation errors across the radiation field.

    • Main Results:

    • Axial Beam Translation (ABT) demonstrated consistent improvement in attenuation estimation accuracy.
    • Inverse Diffraction Filtering (IDF) showed unreliable improvement and was sensitive to phase aberration.
    • IDF's performance degraded with changes in scattering properties of the media.
    • ABT proved more robust in the presence of phase aberration and varying scattering.

    Conclusions:

    • Axial Beam Translation (ABT) is a reliable method for improving attenuation coefficient estimation in scattering media.
    • Inverse Diffraction Filtering (IDF) is not suitable for applications with significant phase aberration or variable scattering.
    • The findings support the use of ABT for more accurate quantitative ultrasound imaging in complex media.