Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026

Quantification of γH2AX Foci in Response to Ionising Radiation
Published on: April 6, 2010
Amplification of DNA damage by a γH2AX-targeted radiopharmaceutical
Bart Cornelissen1, Sonali Darbar, Veerle Kersemans
1Department of Oncology, CR-UK/MRC Gray Institute for Radiation Oncology and Biology, University of Oxford, OX3 7LJ Oxford, UK.
Unlabelled:
(111)In-DTPA-anti-γH2AX-Tat, which combines an anti-γH2AX antibody with a cell-penetrating peptide, Tat, and the Auger electron-emitting radioisotope, (111)In, targets the DNA damage signalling protein, γH2AX, and has potential as a probe for imaging DNA damage in vivo. The goal of this study was to investigate whether (111)In-DTPA-anti-γH2AX-Tat labelled to high specific activity (6MBq/microg) can amplify treatment-related DNA damage for therapeutic gain.
Methods:
MDA-MB-468 and MDA-MB-231/H2N (231-H2N) breast cancer cells were incubated with (111)In-DTPA-anti-γH2AX-Tat (3MBq, 6MBq/microg) or a control radioimmunoconjugate, (111)In-DTPA-mIgG-Tat, and exposed to IR or bleomycin. DNA damage was studied by counting γH2AX foci and by neutral comet assay. Cytotoxicity was evaluated using clonogenic assays. (111)In-DTPA-anti-γH2AX-Tat was administered intravenously to 231-H2N-xenograft-bearing Balb/c nu/nu mice in tumor growth inhibition studies.
Results:
The number of γH2AX foci was greater after exposure of cells to IR (10Gy) plus (111)In-DTPA-anti-γH2AX-Tat compared to IR alone (20.6±2.5 versus 10.4±2.3 foci/cell; P<.001).(111)In-DTPA-anti-γH2AX-Tat resulted in a reduced surviving fraction in cells co-treated with IR (4Gy) versus IR alone (5.2%±0.9% versus 47.8%±2.8%; P<.001). Similarly, bleomycin (25-200microg/mL) plus (111)In-DTPA-anti-γH2AX-Tat resulted in a lower SF compared to bleomycin alone. The combination of a single exposure to IR (10Gy) plus (111)In-DTPA-anti-γH2AX-Tat significantly decreased the growth rate of 231-H2N xenografts in vivo compared to either (111)In-DTPA-anti-γH2AX-Tat or IR alone (-0.002±0.004 versus 0.036±0.011 and 0.031±0.014mm(3)/day, respectively, P<.001).
Conclusion:
(111)In-DTPA-anti-γH2AX-Tat amplifies anticancer treatment-related DNA damage in vitro and has a potent anti-tumor effect when combined with IR in vivo.
Related Concept Videos
Mutations
Chromosomal Alterations Are Large-Scale Mutations
While point mutations are changes in a single nucleotide in...
DNA Damage can Stall the Cell Cycle
DNA Damage Can Stall the Cell Cycle
Nucleotide Excision Repair
Nucleotide Excision Repair
Cells are regularly exposed to mutagens—factors in the environment that can damage DNA and generate mutations. UV radiation is one of the most common mutagens and is estimated to introduce a significant number of changes in DNA. These include bends or kinks in the structure, which can block DNA replication or transcription. If these errors are not fixed, the damage can cause mutations, which in turn can result in cancer or disease depending on which sequences are...

