Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026
An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
Published on: April 17, 2020
Anterior vs. posterior mediastinal routes in colon interposition after esophagectomy
Takatsugu Oida1, Kenji Mimatsu, Hisao Kano
1Department of Surgery, Social Insurance Yokohama Central Hospital, Yokohama, Japan. ooida.takatsugu@yokochu.jp
Background/Aims:
Colon interposition is the most commonly used method of esophageal reconstruction when the stomach cannot be used; however, this method may cause surgical complications such as anastomotic leakage and sepsis due to colon necrosis. Therefore, many surgeons use a retrosternal or subcutaneous route because it is easier to manage the subcutaneous drainage when anastomotic leakage occurs. However, some researchers have reported that the posterior mediastinal route provides better long-term functional outcomes after surgery than the anterior mediastinal route. Thus, in this study, we compared these reconstruction routes used for colon interposition, with or without the supercharge technique, in patients with a history of distal gastrectomy, who have undergone colon interposition after esophagectomy.
Methodology:
We retrospectively studied 30 patients who underwent esophagectomy with colon interposition. These patients were divided into 2 groups based on the reconstruction route: the anterior mediastinal or subcutaneous route (A group), or the posterior mediastinal route (R group).
Results:
Anastomotic leakages were observed in 4 patients (26.7%) in the A group and in 1 patient (6.7%) in the R group.
Conclusions:
Ischemia is not always the result of arterial failure, but may also originate from venous blood flow impairment due to injury or distortion of veins.
