Determining stroke's rank as a cause of death using multicause mortality data
James F Burke1, Lynda D Lisabeth, Devin L Brown
1Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management and Research, Ann Arbor VA Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. jamesbur@med.umich.edu
Insights
Mortality attribution methods did not cause stroke
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Mortality Statistics
Background:
- Stroke has declined as a leading cause of death in the US.
- This decline occurred without significant changes in stroke incidence or case fatality.
- Investigated potential attribution methodology changes as a cause.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if changes in mortality attribution methodology explain stroke's declining rank.
- Hypothesized that stroke mortality is underestimated if attribution methods changed.
- Specifically examined changes in underlying cause of death (UCOD) versus any mention of cause of death (AMCOD) for stroke.
Main Methods:
- Analyzed multicause mortality files from 2000 to 2008.
- Compared changes in stroke as UCOD versus AMCOD.
- Calculated the UCOD/AMCOD ratio for stroke and other leading causes of death.
Main Results:
- Both UCOD and AMCOD death rates for stroke declined by 33%.
- The UCOD/AMCOD ratio for stroke remained stable (0.595 to 0.598).
- Minor changes in UCOD/AMCOD ratios for other leading causes did not explain stroke's decline.
Conclusions:
- Changes in mortality attribution methodology are unlikely to be responsible for stroke's declining rank.
- The discrepancy between stroke incidence, case fatality, and mortality trends warrants further investigation.
- Further research is needed to understand the factors driving these discordant trends.
Background And Purpose:
Stroke has fallen from the second to the fourth leading cause of death in the United States without large declines in stroke incidence or case fatality. We explored whether this decline may be attributable to changes in mortality attribution methodology.
Methods:
Multicause mortality files from 2000 to 2008 were used to compare changes in reporting of stroke as underlying cause of death (UCOD) with changes in death certificates reporting any mention (AMCOD) of stroke. In addition, the UCOD/AMCOD ratio was calculated for the 6 leading organ and disease-specific causes of death. If stroke mortality is underestimated by the system of mortality attribution, we hypothesized that we would find: (1) a greater decline in stroke as UCOD than as AMCOD; and (2) a decline in the UCOD/AMCOD ratio compared with other causes of death.
Results:
Age-adjusted death rates for stroke as UCOD (61 per 100,000 in 2000 versus 41 in 2008) and AMCOD (102 per 100,000 versus 68) both declined by 33%. The ratio of UCOD to AMCOD for stroke did not change over time (0.595 in 2000 versus 0.598 in 2008). Changes in UCOD/AMCOD ratio for the diagnoses that surpassed stroke as UCOD were too small (no change for lung cancer and a slight increase from 0.49 to 0.52 for chronic lower respiratory diseases) to explain stroke's decline as UCOD.
Conclusion:
Changes in mortality attribution methodology are not likely responsible for stroke's decline as a leading cause of death. The discordant trends in incidence, case fatality, and mortality require further study.
Related Concept Videos
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Life Tables
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Cancer Survival Analysis
Kaplan-Meier Approach
