Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
Published on: January 23, 2017
A note on overadjustment in inverse probability weighted estimation
Andrea Rotnitzky1, Lingling Li, Xiaochun Li
1Di Tella University , Sáenz Valiente 1010, Buenos Aires , Argentina andrea@hsph.harvard.edu.
Abstract:
Standardized means, commonly used in observational studies in epidemiology to adjust for potential confounders, are equal to inverse probability weighted means with inverse weights equal to the empirical propensity scores. More refined standardization corresponds with empirical propensity scores computed under more flexible models. Unnecessary standardization induces efficiency loss. However, according to the theory of inverse probability weighted estimation, propensity scores estimated under more flexible models induce improvement in the precision of inverse probability weighted means. This apparent contradiction is clarified by explicitly stating the assumptions under which the improvement in precision is attained.
Related Concept Videos
Weighted Mean
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
Regression Toward the Mean
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

