Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Weighted Mean00:57

Weighted Mean

While taking the arithmetic, geometric, or harmonic mean of a sample data set, equal importance is assigned to all the data points. However, all the values may not always be equally important in some data sets. An intrinsic bias might make it more important to give more weightage to specific values over others.
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this particular...
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the $2,000...
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Towards a Unified Theory for Semiparametric Data Fusion with Individual-Level Data.

Annals of statistics·2026
Same author

Reinforcement Learning for Finding Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes Using Observational Data.

JAMA·2025
Same author

Immune Correlates and Vaccine Immunobridging: Statistical Innovations, Challenges, and Opportunities.

The Journal of infectious diseases·2025
Same author

Investigating Symptom Duration Using Current Status Data: A Case Study of Postacute COVID-19 Syndrome.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same author

Scallop interferon regulatory factor 1 interacts with myeloid differentiation primary response protein 88 and is crucial for antiviral innate immunity.

International journal of biological macromolecules·2022
Same author

[Expression, purification, and characterization of cell-permeable fusion antioxidant enzyme sensitive to matrix metalloproteinases-2/9].

Sheng wu gong cheng xue bao = Chinese journal of biotechnology·2022
Same journal

Individualized dynamic latent factor model for multi-resolutional data with application to mobile health.

Biometrika·2026
Same journal

Functional principal component analysis forsparse censored data.

Biometrika·2026
Same journal

Finding distributions that differ, with false discovery rate control.

Biometrika·2026
Same journal

Sequential Gibbs posteriors with applications to principal component analysis.

Biometrika·2026
Same journal

Comparing causal parameters with many treatments and positivity violations.

Biometrika·2026
Same journal

Leveraging External Data for Testing Experimental Therapies with Biomarker Interactions in Randomized Clinical Trials.

Biometrika·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 20, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

A note on overadjustment in inverse probability weighted estimation.

Andrea Rotnitzky1, Lingling Li, Xiaochun Li

  • 1Di Tella University , Sáenz Valiente 1010, Buenos Aires , Argentina andrea@hsph.harvard.edu.

Biometrika
|July 24, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Standardized means in epidemiology are equivalent to inverse probability weighted means. Using flexible models for propensity scores can improve precision, contrary to initial assumptions about efficiency loss.

More Related Videos

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)

Published on: June 3, 2009

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 20, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)

Published on: June 3, 2009

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Observational Studies

Background:

  • Standardized means are frequently used in epidemiology to adjust for confounders in observational studies.
  • These methods are theoretically linked to inverse probability weighted means, utilizing empirical propensity scores.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clarify the relationship between standardization, propensity scores, and efficiency in epidemiological analyses.
  • To resolve the apparent contradiction between efficiency loss from unnecessary standardization and precision gains from flexible propensity score models.

Main Methods:

  • The study equates standardized means with inverse probability weighted means, using empirical propensity scores.
  • It explores how more flexible models for computing propensity scores impact the precision of these weighted means.

Main Results:

  • Standardized means are equivalent to inverse probability weighted means when using empirical propensity scores.
  • While unnecessary standardization can reduce efficiency, propensity scores estimated via flexible models can enhance the precision of inverse probability weighted means.
  • The study elucidates the specific assumptions required for this precision improvement.

Conclusions:

  • The findings reconcile the theoretical efficiency of standardization with the practical precision gains from advanced propensity score modeling.
  • Understanding the assumptions behind propensity score estimation is crucial for optimizing precision in observational epidemiological studies.