Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
Conditional Akaike information under generalized linear and proportional hazards mixed models.
M C Donohue1, R Overholser, R Xu
1Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, U.S.A. , mdonohue@ucsd.edu.
This study introduces new model selection criteria for clustered data, focusing on cluster-specific inference in mixed models. The methods extend existing approaches and show comparable performance between bootstrap and analytic criteria, with bootstrap advantages for larger clusters.
Area of Science:
- Statistics
- Biostatistics
- Computational Statistics
Background:
- Clustered data analysis often requires cluster-specific inference, frequently modeled using random effects.
- Conditional Akaike information provides a criterion for linear mixed models but requires extension for other mixed models.
- Existing methods for model selection in mixed models are limited, especially for generalized linear and proportional hazards models.
Purpose of the Study:
- To extend conditional Akaike information for model selection in generalized linear and proportional hazards mixed models.
- To develop and evaluate analytic and bootstrap-based criteria for cluster-specific inference.
- To address challenges with nuisance parameters using a profile conditional Akaike information approach.
Main Methods:
- Extension of conditional Akaike information to generalized linear and proportional hazards mixed models.
- Development of analytic criteria using asymptotic approximations for non-normal mixed models.
- Implementation and evaluation of bootstrap methods for model selection in finite samples.
- Proposal of a profile conditional Akaike information to handle nuisance parameters.
Main Results:
- Simulations demonstrate that bootstrap and analytic criteria exhibit comparable performance.
- Bootstrap methods show advantages in finite samples, particularly with larger cluster sizes.
- The proposed criteria effectively select models for cluster-specific inference in applied datasets.
Conclusions:
- The developed criteria provide robust methods for model selection in clustered data with a focus on cluster-specific inference.
- Both analytic and bootstrap approaches are valuable, with bootstrap offering benefits in specific scenarios.
- The methods are successfully applied to real-world cancer datasets, highlighting their practical utility.
Related Concept Videos
Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Hazard Rate
Pharmacodynamic Models: Additive and Proportional Drug Effect Model
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
