Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026

12:26
Fabrication, Operation and Flow Visualization in Surface-acoustic-wave-driven Acoustic-counterflow Microfluidics
Published on: August 27, 2013
Microfluidic acoustic trapping force and stiffness measurement using viscous drag effect
Jungwoo Lee1, Jong Seob Jeong, K Kirk Shung
1Department of Electronic Engineering, Kwangwoon University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. jwlee@kw.ac.kr
Ultrasonics
|July 25, 2012
Summary
This study calibrates acoustic trapping forces for moving droplets in microfluidics. Researchers found that increasing driving voltage and pulse repetition frequency enhances the acoustic trap's strength for precise particle manipulation.
Area of Science:
- Acoustic manipulation
- Microfluidics
- Biophysics
Background:
- Acoustic tweezers enable non-invasive manipulation of microscale objects.
- Calibrating acoustic trapping forces is crucial for precise control of moving particles in microfluidic devices.
- Previous studies have limited calibration of acoustic forces for dynamic targets in microchannels.
Purpose of the Study:
- To experimentally determine the acoustic trapping force and trap stiffness for a moving droplet in a microfluidic channel.
- To calibrate the trapping force against known viscous drag forces generated by fluid flow.
- To investigate the influence of transducer excitation parameters on trapping efficiency.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a 24MHz focused acoustic transducer to trap 70μm droplets in a 500μm microfluidic channel.
- Employed Chebyshev-windowed chirp coded excitation (18-30MHz) for acoustic beam transmission.
- Calibrated trapping force to viscous drag force from syringe pumps, varying pulse repetition frequency (PRF), duty factor (DTF), and input voltage (Vin).
Main Results:
- Minimum trapping force increased with higher input voltage and PRF.
- At PRF=0.1kHz and DTF=30%, minimum trapping force ranged from 2.2nN (22Vpp) to 3.8nN (54Vpp).
- At Vin=54Vpp and DTF=30%, minimum trapping force increased from 3.8nN (0.1kHz) to 6.7nN (0.5kHz).
- Trap stiffness (k) increased with higher Vin and PRF, indicating stronger trapping capabilities.
Conclusions:
- Higher driving voltage and PRF result in stronger acoustic traps for moving droplets.
- Acoustic trapping force and stiffness can be precisely controlled by adjusting transducer excitation parameters.
- This method shows potential for non-invasive manipulation of individual moving targets in microfluidics.

