Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026

Adult and Pediatric Porcine Model of Acute Volume Overload
Published on: January 12, 2024
Pediatric versus adult drug trials for conditions with high pediatric disease burden
Florence T Bourgeois1, Srinivas Murthy, Catia Pinto
1Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital Boston, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA. florence.bourgeois@childrens.harvard.edu
Insights
Pediatric drug trials are underrepresented compared to childhood disease burden, with fewer trials focusing on safety. Funding sources also differ, with pediatric studies relying more on government and nonprofit support.
Area of Science:
- Clinical pharmacology
- Pediatric research
- Drug development
Background:
- Optimal pediatric treatment requires robust safety and efficacy data.
- Concerns exist regarding the underrepresentation and distinct nature of pediatric clinical drug trials compared to adult trials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the prevalence of pediatric studies within clinical drug trials.
- To compare the characteristics and quality indicators of pediatric versus adult drug trials.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of drug trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (2006-2011) for high pediatric disease burden conditions.
- Comparison of trial proportions, subject allocation, characteristics, and quality indicators between pediatric and adult trials.
Main Results:
- Children bear 59.9% of the disease burden, yet only 12.0% of trials were pediatric.
- Pediatric trials were less likely to be industry-funded (58.6% vs 35.0%) and focused less on safety outcomes (10.1% vs 16.9%).
- Pediatric trials showed slightly better registration practices and publication rates.
Conclusions:
- A significant gap exists between the pediatric disease burden and dedicated clinical trial research.
- Funding sources, primarily government and nonprofit for pediatric trials, may influence research focus and prevalence.
Background And Objective:
Optimal treatment decisions in children require sufficient evidence on the safety and efficacy of pharmaceuticals in pediatric patients. However, there is concern that not enough trials are conducted in children and that pediatric trials differ from those performed in adults. Our objective was to measure the prevalence of pediatric studies among clinical drug trials and compare trial characteristics and quality indicators between pediatric and adult drug trials.
Methods:
For conditions representing a high burden of pediatric disease, we identified all drug trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov with start dates between 2006 and 2011 and tracked the resulting publications. We measured the proportion of pediatric trials and subjects for each condition and compared pediatric and adult trial characteristics and quality indicators.
Results:
For the conditions selected, 59.9% of the disease burden was attributable to children, but only 12.0% (292/2440) of trials were pediatric (P < .001). Among pediatric trials, 58.6% were conducted without industry funding compared with 35.0% of adult trials (P < .001). Fewer pediatric compared with adult randomized trials examined safety outcomes (10.1% vs 16.9%, P = .008). Pediatric randomized trials were slightly more likely to be appropriately registered before study start (46.9% vs 39.3%, P = .04) and had a modestly higher probability of publication in the examined time frame (32.8% vs 23.2%, P = .04).
Conclusions:
There is substantial discrepancy between pediatric burden of disease and the amount of clinical trial research devoted to pediatric populations. This may be related in part to trial funding, with pediatric trials relying primarily on government and nonprofit organizations.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Factors Affecting Drug Response: Overview
