Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026
06:42
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
Near-death experiences between science and prejudice
Enrico Facco1, Christian Agrillo
1Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova Padova, Italy.
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
|July 25, 2012
Summary
Near-death experiences (NDEs) present facts challenging purely psychobiological explanations. Current theories often neglect crucial data, risking scientific dogma over empirical evidence.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Philosophy of Science
- Psychology
Background:
- Psychobiological interpretations of near-death experiences (NDEs) are prevalent.
- These interpretations often frame NDEs as mere byproducts of brain dysfunction.
- Empirical facts inconsistent with physicalist and reductionist viewpoints are frequently overlooked.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate existing psychobiological interpretations of NDEs.
- To highlight the epistemological implications of NDEs.
- To advocate for a neutral stance and clear distinction between facts and speculation.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on NDEs and psychobiology.
- Analysis of phenomenological differences between NDEs and delirium.
- Epistemological assessment of scientific claims regarding NDEs.
Main Results:
- Many psychobiological interpretations of NDEs remain speculative.
- Phenomenology of NDEs differs significantly from drug-induced or disorder-related delirium.
- Neglected facts challenge reductionist explanations of NDEs.
Conclusions:
- A rigorous distinction between facts and speculation is essential for NDE research.
- Current psychobiological models may be insufficient to explain all aspects of NDEs.
- Avoiding a priori rejection of NDE facts prevents scientific knowledge from becoming dogma.
Related Concept Videos
02:40The Scientific Method
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
02:55Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who are...
01:13Psychology as a Science
Psychology, as a scientific discipline, aims to understand the mind and behavior through rigorous and systematic methods. The foundation of psychological research is evidence-based, relying heavily on the scientific method to derive and validate knowledge. This structured approach ensures that findings are reliable, valid, and applicable to broader contexts.
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
02:09Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
01:23Extrasensory Perception
Extrasensory perception, or ESP, suggests the ability to perceive events beyond the conventional senses of sight, hearing, and touch. Parapsychologists, who research ESP and related psychic phenomena, categorize ESP into three main types: precognition, telepathy, and clairvoyance.
Precognition involves foreseeing future events, such as predicting an accident before it happens. An example of precognition could be someone dreaming about a specific event, like a car crash, which then occurs...
Precognition involves foreseeing future events, such as predicting an accident before it happens. An example of precognition could be someone dreaming about a specific event, like a car crash, which then occurs...
01:30Scientific Nature of Social Psychology
Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...