Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Microdrill versus perforator for stapedotomy.

M Gjuric1

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology, University of Zagreb, Yugoslavia.

Clinical Otolaryngology and Allied Sciences
|October 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary

This study compared microdrill and perforator stapedotomy hearing outcomes. Both methods yielded similar results, with hearing improving for 6 months post-surgery and then stabilizing.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Endoscopic tympanoplasty for the repair of total tympanic membrane perforation following blast injury (with Video).

European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases·2021
Same author

[Metastasis of a spinal myxopapillary ependymoma to the inner auditory canal].

HNO·2001
Same author

Enlarged middle fossa vestibular schwannoma surgery: experience with 735 cases.

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology·2001
Same author

[Diagnosis of glomus jugulare tumor recurrence with dynamic contrast medium flow in MRI].

RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin·2000
Same author

Extended middle fossa surgery for meningiomas within or at the internal auditory canal.

The American journal of otology·2000
Same author

Cavernous hemangioma of the internal auditory canal arising from the inferior vestibular nerve: case report and review of the literature.

The American journal of otology·2000

Area of Science:

  • Otolaryngology
  • Neurosurgery
  • Surgical Innovation

Background:

  • Stapedotomy is a surgical procedure to improve hearing in patients with otosclerosis.
  • The choice of instrument for creating the fenestra (opening) in the stapes bone, such as a microdrill or perforator, may impact surgical outcomes.
  • Understanding the comparative effectiveness and safety of these instruments is crucial for optimizing patient care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the hearing results following stapedotomy performed with either a microdrill or a perforator.
  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of microdrill versus perforator stapedotomy in terms of inner ear trauma.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative study involving two groups of patients undergoing stapedotomy.
  • Patients were followed up for a minimum of 2 years post-surgery.
  • Hearing outcomes were assessed, and the ability to create a 0.8 mm fenestra was recorded.

Main Results:

  • A 0.8 mm fenestra was successfully created in 91.6% of patients.
  • No significant difference in hearing results was observed between the microdrill and perforator groups.
  • Hearing demonstrated continuous improvement in the first 6 months post-operation, followed by stabilization.

Conclusions:

  • Both microdrill and perforator methods are effective for stapedotomy, yielding comparable hearing results.
  • The microdrill was not found to be more traumatic to the inner ear than the perforator in this study.
  • Stapedotomy outcomes show a trend of improvement in the initial 6 months, with subsequent hearing stability.

Related Experiment Videos