Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Random errors in haematology tests: a process control approach.

B Houwen1

  • 1Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.

Clinical and Laboratory Haematology
|January 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH) recommendations for "surrogate reference" method for the packed cell volume.

Laboratory hematology : official publication of the International Society for Laboratory Hematology·2003
Same author

An interlaboratory study of a candidate reference method for platelet counting.

American journal of clinical pathology·2001
Same author

Flow cytometric method for enumeration and classification of reactive immature granulocyte populations.

Cytometry·2001
Same author

New rapid flow cytometric method for the enumeration of nucleated red blood cells.

Cytometry·1999
Same author

The spun micro-haematocrit and mean red cell volume are affected by changes in the oxygenation state of red blood cells.

Clinical and laboratory haematology·1997
Same author

Flow cytometric reticulocyte analysis. Multiinstitutional interlaboratory correlation study.

American journal of clinical pathology·1994

Random errors in lab testing, occurring throughout the process, require robust prevention and detection. Implementing process controls and specific detection systems significantly reduces reporting errors.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Laboratory Science
  • Healthcare Quality Improvement
  • Medical Diagnostics

Background:

  • Classic quality-control methods often fail to detect random errors.
  • Random errors can occur at any stage of test result generation, from collection to charting.
  • Effective error management necessitates a comprehensive approach beyond analytical procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss a systems approach for preventing and detecting random errors in laboratory testing.
  • To identify specific measures for reducing the incidence and reporting of random errors.
  • To outline recommendations for enhanced process control and error detection.

Main Methods:

  • Implementing machine-readable specimen labels at collection points.
  • Integrating laboratory instruments with computer systems for automated data flow.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Streamlining data entry processes to minimize manual input errors.
  • Utilizing parameter-flagging criteria for result validation.
  • Employing internal consistency checks and delta checking for result verification.

    • Main Results:

    • Suggested measures can significantly reduce the frequency of random errors.
    • A systems approach is crucial for the success of error reduction strategies.
    • While complete elimination is unlikely, incidence and reporting of errors can be substantially lowered.

    Conclusions:

    • A proactive, systems-based strategy is essential for managing random errors in laboratory diagnostics.
    • Specific interventions like automated data handling and advanced result checking improve test result quality.
    • Continuous process improvement is key to minimizing random errors in healthcare settings.