Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The structure of graphemic representations.

A Caramazza1, G Miceli

  • 1Cognitive Science Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218.

Cognition
|December 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cerebrovascular reactivity impairment in resistant hypertension.

Journal of human hypertension·2025
Same author

Early intervention is important when administering glucarpidase for methotrexate intoxication. Author's reply.

European journal of internal medicine·2024
Same author

Late administration of glucarpidase in methotrexate intoxication: Do we have more time than we thought?

European journal of internal medicine·2023
Same author

The form of reference frames in vision: The case of intermediate shape-centered representations.

Neuropsychologia·2021
Same author

Lateralized cognitive functions in Parkinson's patients: A behavioral approach for the early detection of sustained attention deficits.

Brain research·2019
Same author

Advantages and disadvantages of intraoperative language tasks in awake surgery: a three-task approach for prefrontal tumors.

Journal of neurosurgical sciences·2015
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Productivity matters for the neural processing of novel words, but not existing ones" Cognition Volume 274 (2026) 106593.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Investigating the origins of partisanship: What motivates children to preferentially endorse their ingroups' claims?

Cognition·2026
Same journal

People make graded judgments about the inconceivable.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

The self as an image: Appearance and belief in visual representations of one's own face.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to 'Consonant, vowel, and tone cues in early wordform recognition: Evidence from Cantonese-learning infants' [Cognition 275 (2026) 106624].

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Identifying distinct sources of whole number interference in children's decimal comparison: the role of numerical magnitude and inhibitory control.

Cognition·2026
See all related articles

Brain-damaged dysgraphia reveals spelling is affected by graphotactic factors, not just linear graphemes. Graphemic representations are multidimensional, considering consonant/vowel status and syllable structure.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Linguistics
  • Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • Spelling relies on complex graphemic representations.
  • Previous models suggested linear grapheme ordering.
  • Dysgraphia offers insights into spelling processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Analyze spelling in a brain-damaged dysgraphic subject.
  • Investigate the role of graphotactic factors in spelling.
  • Challenge the linear grapheme representation hypothesis.

Main Methods:

  • Case study of a single dysgraphic patient.
  • Analysis of spelling errors related to graphotactic factors.
  • Comparison of error patterns for consonant/vowel clusters versus single graphemes.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Spelling errors were influenced by consonant/vowel distinctions and graphosyllabic structure.
  • Deletion errors were common in consonant and vowel clusters.
  • Deletions were rare for single consonants or vowels in specific contexts.

Conclusions:

  • Graphemic representations are not simply linear.
  • Spelling involves multidimensional graphemic structures.
  • These structures include grapheme identity, consonant/vowel status, graphosyllabic structure, and geminate features.