Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Pharmacodynamic Models: Linear Concentration–Effect Model01:15

Pharmacodynamic Models: Linear Concentration–Effect Model

The linear concentration–effect model, underpinned by the principle that pharmacological effect (E) is directly proportional to plasma drug concentration (C), emerges as a pivotal simplification of the Emax model for conditions where C is significantly less than EC50. This model portrays a linear trajectory of the concentration–effect relationship when drug levels are markedly below the EC50 threshold.Despite its inherent assumption of continuous effect augmentation with increasing drug...
Pharmacodynamic Models: Logarithmic Concentration–Effect Model01:15

Pharmacodynamic Models: Logarithmic Concentration–Effect Model

The log-linear model is a pharmacological framework used to describe the relationship between drug concentration and its effect. This model is particularly relevant when the observed effects range between 20% and 80% of the drug’s maximum effect (Emax), where a near-linear relationship is observed between the log of drug concentration and the measured effect. However, the log-linear model does not predict the maximum possible effect (Emax) or the effect at zero drug concentration, limiting its...
Pharmacodynamic Models: Additive and Proportional Drug Effect Model01:09

Pharmacodynamic Models: Additive and Proportional Drug Effect Model

Drug response models describe how pharmacological agents interact with biological systems to produce measurable effects. Baseline responses are inherent physiological activities without a drug significantly influencing the observed pharmacological outcomes. Depending on the drug response model employed, these baseline responses may combine with the drug's effect in either an additive or proportional manner.Additive Drug Response ModelIn the additive model, the drug effect is independent of the...
Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model01:29

Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model

Pharmacodynamic models are essential tools in understanding the relationship between drug concentrations and their effects on biological systems. By characterizing the dynamics of drug action, these models guide dose selection, optimize therapeutic efficacy, and inform the development of new drugs. Two major classes of pharmacodynamic models include direct effect and indirect response models.Direct Effect ModelsDirect effect models describe the immediate relationship between drug concentration...
Dose Response Curve: Conventional Versus Nonmonotonic01:21

Dose Response Curve: Conventional Versus Nonmonotonic

The correlation between a drug's dosage and its impact on a biological system is a cornerstone of pharmacology and toxicology. Conventional dose–response curves, which include graded and quantal relationships, are key to this understanding. Graded dose–response curves depict the spectrum of a biological reaction to different doses within an individual, indicating that as the drug dosage increases, so does the intensity of the response. On the other hand, quantal dose–response relationships...
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Problems01:24

Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Problems

The empirical approach to drug therapy optimization relies on correlating pharmacological response with administered dosage. Such an approach can be costly, time-consuming, and often yields poor correlation due to variables like formulation factors and drug elimination characteristics. A more precise approach correlates response with plasma drug concentration or the amount of drug in the body, rather than dosage. This is achieved through pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling, which...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Corrigendum to "Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure on cancer in laboratory animal studies, a systematic review" [Environ. Int. 199 (2025) 109482].

Environment international·2026
Same author

Tree-based exploratory identification of predictive biomarkers in non-randomized data.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same author

Molecular Characterization of an Isolate of Tobacco Streak Virus Naturally Infecting <i>Areca catechu</i> L. in China-A First Case in the Family Arecaceae.

Plants (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Clustered monoallelic mosaicism in twins suggests previously unrecognized path of mutagenesis.

HGG advances·2026
Same author

Correction: Paediatric Phase I/II Clinical Trial Assessments Under the New EU Clinical Trial Regulation: A Descriptive Analysis.

Pharmaceutical medicine·2026
Same author

Interpreting [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG-avid fractures after induction therapy in multiple myeloma: insights from the PET/CT sub-study of the Phase 3 GMMG-HD7 trial.

European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 20, 2026

Evaluating Toxicity of Chemicals using a Zebrafish Vibration Startle Response Screening System
06:25

Evaluating Toxicity of Chemicals using a Zebrafish Vibration Startle Response Screening System

Published on: January 12, 2024

The impact of data transformations on concentration-response modeling.

Marc Weimer1, Xiaoqi Jiang, Oriana Ponta

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

Toxicology Letters
|July 26, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Linear data transformations in concentration-response studies do not alter EC50 or Hill slope estimates. However, fixing parameters can lead to errors, especially when normalizing data for background correction.

More Related Videos

Procedure to Evaluate the Efficiency of Flocculants for the Removal of Dispersed Particles from Plant Extracts
10:37

Procedure to Evaluate the Efficiency of Flocculants for the Removal of Dispersed Particles from Plant Extracts

Published on: April 9, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 20, 2026

Evaluating Toxicity of Chemicals using a Zebrafish Vibration Startle Response Screening System
06:25

Evaluating Toxicity of Chemicals using a Zebrafish Vibration Startle Response Screening System

Published on: January 12, 2024

Procedure to Evaluate the Efficiency of Flocculants for the Removal of Dispersed Particles from Plant Extracts
10:37

Procedure to Evaluate the Efficiency of Flocculants for the Removal of Dispersed Particles from Plant Extracts

Published on: April 9, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacology
  • Biostatistics
  • Toxicology

Background:

  • Concentration-response studies are crucial for determining substance potency.
  • Non-linear regression, particularly the log-logistic model, is commonly used for data evaluation.
  • Data transformations are often applied for practical reasons, such as assay comparability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To mathematically prove the impact of linear data transformations on concentration-response parameters.
  • To investigate the consequences of fixing model parameters during analysis.
  • To provide practical recommendations for concentration-response data analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Mathematical proof of the effect of linear transformations on EC50 and Hill slope.
  • Analysis of parameter estimation when certain model parameters are fixed.
  • Computer simulations and a real-world data example to illustrate findings.

Main Results:

  • Linear data transformations preserve EC50 and Hill slope estimates.
  • Transformed parameters for lower and upper boundaries are identical to the transformation.
  • Fixing parameters, especially after background correction and normalization, can yield erroneous estimates.

Conclusions:

  • Linear data transformations are mathematically sound for EC50 and Hill slope estimation.
  • Care must be taken when fixing parameters in reduced models to avoid biased results.
  • Recommendations are provided for robust concentration-response data analysis.