Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Managing Impressions

Managing Impressions

Impression management encompasses individuals' deliberate efforts to shape how others perceive them during social interactions. This behavior is often employed to conform to social norms, secure approval, or pursue specific goals. While it involves selective self-presentation, it is not necessarily deceptive; individuals frequently present authentic aspects of themselves that align with situational demands.Common strategies include:Ingratiation: where individuals use flattery or agreeableness...

Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions

Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions

Aligning actions are communicative strategies individuals employ to maintain social harmony and preserve personal identity in the face of potential disruptions to social norms. These actions are particularly important in managing social impressions when one's behavior might be seen as inappropriate, incompetent, or morally questionable.Types of Aligning ActionsThe three principal types of aligning actions are disclaimers, accounts, and apologies.DisclaimersDisclaimers are preventive; they are...

Impression Management Techniques I: Managing Appearances

Impression Management Techniques I: Managing Appearances

Appearance is a multidimensional aspect of self-presentation that encompasses observable attributes such as clothing, grooming, speech, and nonverbal behavior. These elements are often strategically managed to align with socially constructed expectations in different settings. For instance, individuals tailor their appearance during job interviews, social gatherings, or athletic events to meet the perceived norms of those environments.Contextual Adaptation and Social SignalsThe research...

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about the way you...

Protecting Self-Esteem

Protecting Self-Esteem

Self-esteem, a central component of psychological well-being, is actively maintained through various cognitive and behavioral strategies. Individuals employ specific mechanisms to preserve a positive self-concept and mitigate threats to their self-worth, particularly in contexts involving social evaluation or personal feedback. Four primary techniques are commonly used to sustain self-esteem.Manipulating AppraisalsOne prominent strategy involves manipulating appraisals from others. Individuals...

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

US Food and Drug Administration and Regulation Issues for Biologics: The Sands Are Shifting.

Facial plastic surgery clinics of North America·2026

Same author

Business associates gone bad: five tales of woe and ways to prevent them from happening to you.

The Journal of medical practice management : MPM·2015

Same author

Simple steps to protect your online reputation.

Today's FDA : official monthly journal of the Florida Dental Association·2012

Same author

Defensive medicine: a culprit in spiking healthcare costs.

Medical economics·2012

Same author

Online doctor reviews: do they track surgeon volume, a proxy for quality of care?

Journal of medical Internet research·2012

Same author

The good, the bad and the ugly of federal health care reform.

Journal of the Medical Association of Georgia·2011

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 20, 2026

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community

Published on: May 31, 2019

Managing your online reputation.

Jeffrey Segal¹

¹Medical Justice Services, Inc., USA. jsegal@medicaljustice.com

The Journal of Medical Practice Management : MPM

|July 28, 2012

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Online reviews impact doctor reputation and patient trust. Proactive reputation management strategies can help doctors navigate anonymous feedback and protect their practice, even with HIPAA limitations.

More Related Videos

How Virtual Celebrity Characteristics Drive Purchase Intention: Testing the Stimulus-Organism-Response Framework with Structural Equation Modeling

How Virtual Celebrity Characteristics Drive Purchase Intention: Testing the Stimulus-Organism-Response Framework with Structural Equation Modeling

Published on: March 3, 2026

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 20, 2026

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community

Published on: May 31, 2019

How Virtual Celebrity Characteristics Drive Purchase Intention: Testing the Stimulus-Organism-Response Framework with Structural Equation Modeling

How Virtual Celebrity Characteristics Drive Purchase Intention: Testing the Stimulus-Organism-Response Framework with Structural Equation Modeling

Published on: March 3, 2026

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

Area of Science:

Healthcare Management
Digital Health
Medical Ethics

Background:

The proliferation of online doctor review sites presents challenges for healthcare professionals.
Patient feedback is often anonymous, and doctors face limitations (e.g., HIPAA) in responding directly.
Current online reviews rarely focus on critical aspects like patient safety or clinical outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

To explore the impact of online reviews on a doctor's professional reputation and business.
To provide actionable strategies for doctors to manage their online reputation proactively.
To address the challenges posed by anonymous online feedback and regulatory constraints.

Main Methods:

Analysis of the current landscape of online doctor review platforms.
Review of legal and ethical considerations (e.g., HIPAA) affecting doctor responses.
Development of a framework for proactive online reputation management.

Main Results:

Online reputation significantly influences patient perception and practice viability.
Anonymous reviews and HIPAA restrictions create a complex environment for reputation management.
Proactive strategies are essential for doctors to control their online narrative.

Conclusions:

Doctors must actively manage their online presence to mitigate negative impacts.
Implementing specific reputation management rules can safeguard a doctor's business.
A strategic approach is necessary to address the challenges of digital feedback in healthcare.