Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Interference from semantically distracting sounds in action scene search.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025
Same author

Effects of wearing an opaque or transparent face mask on the perception of facial expressions: A comparative study between Japanese school-aged children and adults.

Perception·2023
Same author

Prefrontal GABA and glutamate-glutamine levels affect sustained attention.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2023
Same author

Attentional shift to the newer object in the successive and simultaneous distractors previewing search.

Vision research·2023
Same author

Occlusion of faces by sanitary masks improves facial attractiveness of other races.

Frontiers in psychology·2023
Same author

Attentional biases toward real images and drawings of negative faces.

Acta psychologica·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 20, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Attentional set protects visual marking from visual transients.

Takayuki Osugi1, Jun I Kawahara

  • 1National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, AIST, Tsukuba, Japan. mtaka-oosugi@aist.go.jp

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
|July 28, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Visual marking, where old items are excluded during search, is vulnerable to shape changes. However, this visual search effect is preserved when an observer's attentional set aligns with item features, indicating top-down control.

More Related Videos

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 20, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Visual marking is a phenomenon where previously seen items are excluded from visual search.
  • Shape identity is considered crucial for maintaining visual marking, as shape changes typically abolish the effect.
  • The role of top-down attentional set in preserving visual marking under shape change conditions remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether the vulnerability of visual marking to shape changes depends on the observer's attentional set.
  • To examine how attentional set compatibility influences the maintenance of visual marking when item shapes change.
  • To determine the contribution of top-down control to visual marking under shape change.

Main Methods:

  • An inefficient visual search task was employed.
  • Distractors (old items) were presented before other items (new items).
  • Shape changes were introduced to old items, with attentional set manipulated for compatibility with these changes.

Main Results:

  • Visual marking persisted despite shape changes when the observer's attentional set was compatible with critical features between old and new items.
  • This protective effect was evident with both explicitly instructed and implicitly transferred task sets.
  • Top-down attentional processes appear to maintain visual marking by influencing grouping and suppression during search.

Conclusions:

  • The maintenance of visual marking under shape change is contingent on the observer's attentional set.
  • Top-down control plays a significant role in maintaining memory templates for visual search, overriding disruptive bottom-up signals.
  • Attentional set can enhance grouping and suppression mechanisms, thus preserving visual marking even when item features change.