Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Implementation Science six years on--our evolving scope and common reasons for rejection without review
Martin P Eccles1, Robbie Foy, Anne Sales
1Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, The Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK. martin.eccles@ncl.ac.uk
This editorial discusses common reasons for manuscript rejection in Implementation Science. Addressing these issues can help authors improve their submissions and increase acceptance rates.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Scientific Publishing
Background:
- Implementation Science journal has experienced significant growth in submissions and impact factor.
- The journal's publication rate has not kept pace with the submission rate, leading to increased rejections.
- Approximately 50% of submitted manuscripts are rejected before peer review.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify and communicate common reasons for manuscript rejection without peer review.
- To assist authors in better assessing the relevance of their work to the Implementation Science journal.
- To improve the quality of submissions and reduce unnecessary rejections.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of manuscript rejection data from Implementation Science.
- Identification of recurring issues leading to desk rejection.
- Editorial review and synthesis of common rejection reasons.
Main Results:
- A significant portion of submissions are rejected due to common, identifiable issues.
- Understanding these issues can guide authors in refining their manuscripts.
- The journal aims to streamline the submission process by clarifying expectations.
Conclusions:
- Authors can improve their chances of publication by understanding common rejection pitfalls.
- This editorial serves as a guide to enhance manuscript relevance and quality for Implementation Science.
- Proactive attention to common issues can lead to more successful submissions.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Longitudinal Research
