Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Errors and Mistakes in Surveying01:19

Errors and Mistakes in Surveying

Errors and mistakes in surveying refer to inaccuracies in measurements and data recording. The errors are deviations from the actual value caused by human sensory limitations, equipment flaws, or environmental effects. These errors are typically unintentional and can result from the inherent imperfections in the instruments used, atmospheric conditions, or the observer’s inability to perceive exact measurements. On the other hand, mistakes are caused by the surveyor's lack of attention,...
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Design of PROGRESSION-IPF: A pragmatic, open-label, randomized trial of patients with progressive disease in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Respiratory medicine and research·2026
Same author

FAIRification of biomedical research data.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2025
Same author

Randomised controlled trial to assess the impact of hospital-community pharmaceutical care on drug-related problems in oncology practice for at-risk outpatients treated with oral anticancer drugs-a French Society for Oncology Pharmacy (SFPO) study: DROP-SFPO study protocol.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

A Bundle of Interventions to Prevent Pressure Ulcers During Prone Position in Adult Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Results of a French Stepped-Wedge Randomized Controlled Trial.

Nursing in critical care·2025
Same author

Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy devices applied after Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Hospital-Based Health Technology Assessment.

PloS one·2025
Same author

BEST study: one-year descriptive follow-up of bevacizumab treatment in hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia post-BABH interventional study.

Therapeutic advances in hematology·2025
Same journal

Predictive analytics and risk stratification models in internal medicine: from risk scores to real-time machine learning.

Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983)·2026
Same journal

Artificial Intelligence in skin disease therapeutics: from drug discovery to personalized treatment pathways.

Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983)·2026
Same journal

AI in clinical diagnostics in dermatology: applications, validation, and real-world use cases.

Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983)·2026
Same journal

Artificial Intelligence in medical research and publishing: progress, risks, and future perspectives.

Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983)·2026
Same journal

Ethical, legal, and regulatory challenges in AI-based healthcare tools.

Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983)·2026
Same journal

Decision-making for clinicians.

Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 20, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

[Retractions due to errors and frauds].

Evelyne Decullier1, Géraldine Samson, Laure Huot

  • 1Hospices civils de Lyon, pôle information médicale évaluation recherche, unité de recherche clinique, 69003 Lyon, France. evelyne.decullier@chu-lyon.fr

Presse Medicale (Paris, France : 1983)
|July 31, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Scientific retractions correct errors and fraud in publications. While the retraction rate rose tenfold from 1999-2009, it remains rare, highlighting the need for quality control and misconduct detection systems.

Area of Science:

  • Bibliometrics
  • Scientific Publishing
  • Research Integrity

More Related Videos

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
07:26

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

Published on: January 31, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 20, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
07:26

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

Published on: January 31, 2017