Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026

Laparoscopic Anatomical Resection of the Right Anterior Lobe Based on the Laennec Capsule Technique
Published on: May 2, 2025
Appendectomy timing: waiting until the next morning increases the risk of surgical site infections
Pedro G Teixeira1, Emre Sivrikoz, Kenji Inaba
1Los Angeles County + University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Objective:
To investigate the association between time from admission to appendectomy (TTA) and the incidence of perforation and infectious complications.
Background:
Immediate appendectomy to prevent perforation has been challenged by recent studies supporting a semielective approach to acute appendicitis.
Methods:
Patients admitted with appendicitis from July 2003 to June 2011 were reviewed. Age, sex, admission white blood cell count, surgical approach (open vs laparoscopic), TTA, and pathology report were abstracted. Primary outcomes included perforation and surgical site infection (SSI). Logistic regression was performed both to identify independent predictors of perforation and to investigate the association between TTA and SSI.
Results:
Over 8 years, 4529 patients were admitted with appendicitis and 4108 (91%) patients underwent appendectomy. Perforation occurred in 23% (n = 942) of these patients. Logistic regression identified 3 independent predictors of perforation: age 55 years or older [odds ratio (95% confidence interval) OR (95% CI), 1.66 (1.21-2.29); P = 0.002], white blood cell count more than 16,000 [OR (95% CI), 1.38 (1.15-1.64); P < 0.001], and female sex [OR (95% CI), 1.20 (1.02-1.41); P = 0.02]. Delay to appendectomy was not associated with higher perforation rate. However, after controlling for age, leukocytosis, sex, laparoscopic approach, and perforation, TTA of more than 6 hours was independently associated with an increase in SSI [OR (95% CI), 1.54 (1.01-2.34); P = 0.04]. Delay of more than 6 hours resulted in a significant increase in SSI from 1.9% to 3.3% among patients with nonperforated appendicitis [OR (95% CI), 2.16 (1.03-4.52); P = 0.03], raising the incidence of SSI in nonperforated appendicitis to levels similar to those with perforation (3.3% vs 3.9%, P = 0.47).
Conclusions:
In this series, appendectomy delay did not increase the risk of perforation but was associated with a significantly increased risk of SSI in patients with nonperforated appendicitis. Prompt surgical intervention is warranted to avoid additional morbidity in this population.
Related Concept Videos
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Appendicitis
