Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
Pharmacodynamic Models: Additive and Proportional Drug Effect Model01:09

Pharmacodynamic Models: Additive and Proportional Drug Effect Model

Drug response models describe how pharmacological agents interact with biological systems to produce measurable effects. Baseline responses are inherent physiological activities without a drug significantly influencing the observed pharmacological outcomes. Depending on the drug response model employed, these baseline responses may combine with the drug's effect in either an additive or proportional manner.Additive Drug Response ModelIn the additive model, the drug effect is independent of the...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Donor Selection and Human Leukocyte Antigen Loss Leukemia Relapse After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2026
Same author

Regulatory factor X 7 limits Myc activity during B cell activation and suppresses Myc-dependent lymphomagenesis.

Nature immunology·2026
Same author

Nanoengineered 3D culture substrate enables superior persistence and polyclonal engraftment of genetically engineered hematopoietic stem cells.

Cell stem cell·2026
Same author

Optimal time between decompressive craniectomy and cranioplasty to reduce the risk of complications: A retrospective study.

Neurosurgical review·2026
Same author

Tweaking lentiviral vector design balances efficacy and safety in liver-directed gene therapy for familial hypercholesterolemia.

Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy·2025
Same author

Preparedness for the Digital Transition in Healthcare: Insights from an Italian Sample of Professionals.

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 20, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Evaluating treatment effect within a multivariate stochastic ordering framework: Nonparametric combination

Chiara Brombin1, Clelia Di Serio2

  • 1University Centre for Statistics in the Biomedical Sciences, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Italy.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|July 31, 2012
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new statistical method to compare treatments for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). The approach helps determine the superiority of therapies like interferons or glatiramer acetate for managing MS symptoms.

Keywords:
Multiple sclerosismultivariate stochastic orderingnonparametric combination methodologyobservational studies

More Related Videos

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 20, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimmunology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune disease impacting the central nervous system, presenting diverse symptoms and lacking a definitive cure.
  • Current therapies aim to slow disability progression and manage symptoms, improving patients' quality of life.
  • Relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients often receive treatments such as interferons or glatiramer acetate, though their comparative effectiveness requires further elucidation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and validate a novel statistical framework for comparing the relative effectiveness of RRMS treatments.
  • To address the challenge of assessing treatment superiority using multivariate outcomes in a clinical setting.
  • To provide a robust method for hypothesis testing in the context of monotonic stochastic ordering.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a statistical approach utilizing permutation settings and nonparametric combination of dependent permutation tests.
  • Application of the proposed method to analyze data from a large, observational, Italian multicentre study on multiple sclerosis.
  • Handling of multiple continuous and categorical outcomes measured across various time points.

Main Results:

  • The proposed statistical approach facilitates hypothesis testing for multivariate monotonic stochastic ordering.
  • This framework allows for a more nuanced comparison of treatment effectiveness beyond classical parametric methods.
  • The method is demonstrated to be suitable for analyzing complex, real-world clinical data from MS patients.

Conclusions:

  • The developed statistical methodology offers a powerful tool for evaluating and comparing therapies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
  • This approach enhances the ability to establish treatment superiority, particularly when dealing with multiple outcome measures.
  • The study provides a statistically rigorous foundation for clinical decision-making regarding MS treatment options.