Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026
08:34
Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
Uncertainty in patient set-up margin analysis in radiation therapy
Junji Suzuki1, Kunihiko Tateoka, Katsumi Shima
1Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo Medical University, S1 W6 Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Japan.
Journal of Radiation Research
|July 31, 2012
Summary
Patient set-up margin analysis in radiation therapy can be improved. Using the percentile method with actual patient data, instead of assuming normal distribution, provides a more accurate set-up margin estimate, reducing uncertainty.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Radiotherapy
Background:
- Accurate patient positioning is crucial in radiation therapy to ensure precise dose delivery.
- Patient set-up errors can lead to under- or over-dosing, impacting treatment efficacy and safety.
- Traditional methods for set-up margin analysis often assume normal distribution of errors, which may not reflect clinical reality.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the uncertainty in patient set-up margin analysis using limited clinical data.
- To propose an optimized method for determining the set-up margin that accounts for non-normally distributed errors.
- To reduce uncertainty in patient set-up margin analysis in radiation therapy.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of patient set-up errors from 555 registration images of 15 prostate cancer patients.
- Normality testing using quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plots and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests.
- Comparison of set-up error ranges using percentile method (2.5% and 97.5% intervals) versus assumed normal distributions.
Main Results:
- Patient set-up error data was found to be not normally distributed.
- Assuming a normal distribution led to both under- and overestimation of actual set-up errors in some patients.
- The percentile method using the 2.5% and 97.5% intervals of the actual data histogram provided a more accurate estimation.
Conclusions:
- Patient set-up error distributions in clinical practice are often not normal.
- The percentile method is recommended for estimating set-up margins with limited datasets to improve accuracy.
- Implementing this method can significantly reduce uncertainty in radiation therapy patient set-up margin analysis.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:10Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this particular...
00:59Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...