Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026

Novel In Vivo Micro-Computed Tomography Imaging Techniques for Assessing the Progression of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Published on: March 24, 2023
Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a 3.0-T MR study
Boris Guiu1, Jean-Michel Petit, Violaine Capitan
1University of Burgundy, INSERM U866, Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology, and Metabolic Diseases, CHU University Hospital, Dijon, France. Boris.guiu@chu-dijon.fr
Purpose:
To compare pure molecular diffusion, D, perfusion-related diffusion, D*, and perfusion fraction, f, determined from diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging on the basis of the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) theory in patients with type 2 diabetes with and without liver steatosis.
Materials And Methods:
This prospective study was approved by the appropriate ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Between December 2009 and September 2011, 108 patients with type 2 diabetes (51 men, 57 women; mean age, 50 years) underwent 3.0-T single-voxel point-resolved proton MR spectroscopy of the liver (segment VII) to calculate the liver fat fraction from water (4.76 ppm) and methylene (1.33 ppm) peaks, corrected for T1 and T2 decay. Steatosis was defined as a liver fat fraction of at least 5.56%. DW imaging was performed by using a single-shot echo-planar sequence with 11 b values (0, 5, 15, 25, 35, 50, 100, 200, 400, 600, 800 sec/mm2). Liver D, D*, and f were measured and compared in patients with and patients without steatosis (Mann-Whitney test).
Results:
The mean liver fat fraction was 7.8% (standard deviation, 9%; range, 0.99%-45%). Forty patients had liver steatosis. D was significantly lower in steatotic compared with nonsteatotic livers (mean, 1.03×10(-3) mm2/sec±0.23 [standard deviation] vs 1.24×10(-3) mm2/sec±0.15, respectively; P<.0001), as was D* (mean, 72.2×10(-3) mm2/sec±61.4 vs 110.6×10(-3) mm2/sec±79; P=.0025). However, f was significantly higher in steatotic compared with nonsteatotic livers (mean, 33.8%±9.4 vs 26.9%±8.8; P=.0003).
Conclusion:
D is significantly decreased in steatosis. The reduction in D* reflects decreased liver parenchymal perfusion in steatosis. Therefore, steatosis can affect diffusion parameters obtained with IVIM.
Insights
Diffusion-weighted MRI reveals decreased pure molecular diffusion (D) and perfusion-related diffusion (D*) in type 2 diabetes patients with liver steatosis. Perfusion fraction (f) was elevated, indicating altered liver microcirculation.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
- Hepatology
Background:
- Type 2 diabetes is associated with an increased risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).
- Liver steatosis, characterized by fat accumulation in hepatocytes, can lead to inflammation and fibrosis.
- Diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) modeling offers insights into liver tissue microdynamics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare diffusion parameters (D, D*, f) derived from IVIM theory in type 2 diabetes patients with and without liver steatosis.
- To assess the impact of liver steatosis on liver parenchymal diffusion and perfusion characteristics.
Main Methods:
- Prospective study involving 108 type 2 diabetes patients.
- Liver fat fraction quantified using 3.0-T single-voxel proton MR spectroscopy.
- Steatosis defined as a liver fat fraction ≥ 5.56%.
- DW imaging acquired with 11 b values (0–800 sec/mm²).
- IVIM parameters (D, D*, f) calculated and compared between groups.
Main Results:
- Forty patients (37%) had liver steatosis.
- Significantly lower pure molecular diffusion (D) in steatotic livers (1.03×10⁻³ mm²/sec) vs. non-steatotic livers (1.24×10⁻³ mm²/sec; P<.0001).
- Significantly lower perfusion-related diffusion (D*) in steatotic livers (72.2×10⁻³ mm²/sec) vs. non-steatotic livers (110.6×10⁻³ mm²/sec; P=.0025).
- Significantly higher perfusion fraction (f) in steatotic livers (33.8%) vs. non-steatotic livers (26.9%; P=.0003).
Conclusions:
- Liver steatosis in type 2 diabetes patients is associated with significantly decreased pure molecular diffusion (D).
- Reduced perfusion-related diffusion (D*) suggests impaired liver parenchymal perfusion in steatosis.
- IVIM-derived diffusion parameters are affected by the presence of liver steatosis.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Assessment of Diffusion and Perfusion
The Role of Diffusion in Respiration
Diffusion is the process by which molecules move from an area of higher concentration to an area of lower concentration. In the respiratory system, this principle...
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
