Construct validity of the Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test for children with cerebral palsy

Megan Thorley1, Natasha Lannin, Anne Cusick

  • 1The Rehabilitation Studies Unit, University of Sydney and Queensland Cerebral Palsy Health Service, Royal Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia. m.thorley@uq.edu.au

Insights

The Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST) is not a unidimensional measure for children with cerebral palsy (CP). Reporting domain and limb-specific scores is recommended over total scores for better validity.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Rehabilitation
  • Neuroscience
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Cerebral palsy (CP) significantly impacts upper extremity function in children.
  • The Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST) is commonly used to assess these functional limitations.
  • Understanding the psychometric properties of assessment tools is crucial for accurate clinical evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the construct validity of the Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST) in pediatric cerebral palsy.
  • To determine if the QUEST functions as a unidimensional measure for children with CP.
  • To identify specific areas of the QUEST that may require revision for improved clinical utility.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective analysis of 170 QUEST assessments from 94 children with cerebral palsy (GMFCS levels I-V) was conducted.
  • Data from children involved in clinical and research treatment programs were utilized.
  • Statistical methods were employed to assess the unidimensionality and item fit of the QUEST.

Main Results:

  • The QUEST did not demonstrate unidimensionality when analyzing total scores.
  • Item fit improved when domains and individual limbs were analyzed separately.
  • Items related to elbow flexion and forearm pronation showed low sensitivity; grasp domain posture items exhibited erratic behavior and poor correlation with total scores.

Conclusions:

  • Total scores from the QUEST are not recommended for use in children with CP due to poor construct validity.
  • Reporting results segmented by domain and by limb is advised for more accurate interpretation.
  • The removal of grasp domain posture items from the QUEST is recommended due to their lack of relationship with overall scores.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos