Still making the case against prehospital intubation: a rat hemorrhagic shock model

Prehospital intubation does not appear to result in a survival advantage for patients experiencing penetrating trauma; yet, there is still resistance to the practice of "scoop and run" to speed access to advanced care. An animal model was used to determine whether intubation provides a survival advantage during potentially lethal hemorrhage.

The carotid arteries of Sprague-Dawley rats were cannulated, and mean arterial pressure (MAP) was measured. One group of animals (n = 10) was intubated and placed on a ventilator, whereas the other (n = 9) was administered with 100% oxygen via nose cone. Rats were exsanguinated to a MAP of 40 mm Hg and then bled periodically to maintain a MAP between 40 mm Hg and 45 mm Hg. The primary end-point was time until death. Secondary end-points included lactic acid and base excess levels measured in blood collected at 30-minute intervals after inducing shock.

There was no significant difference in time until death between the intubated and nose cone groups (85.5 vs. 93.3 minutes, p = 0.60). Intubated animals had higher lactic acid levels at 90 minutes (6.1 vs. 3.5 mmol/L; p = 0.02) and 120 minutes (7.7 vs. 2.6 mmol/L, p = 0.03) after the initiation of shock. In addition, intubated animals had worse base excess at 90 minutes (-13.5 vs. -7.9 mmol/L, p = 0.04).

Intubation does not result in a survival advantage in this rat model of hemorrhagic shock. Positive pressure ventilation may cause decreased venous return and accentuate end-organ hypoperfusion. Large animal studies are needed to further investigate these findings.