Ontogeny tends to recapitulate phylogeny in digital organisms
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
Published on: November 2, 2012
Jeff Clune1, Robert T Pennock, Charles Ofria
1Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA. jeffclune@cornell.edu
Abstract:
Biologists have long debated whether ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny and, if so, why. Two plausible explanations are that (i) changes to early developmental stages are selected against because they tend to disrupt later development and (ii) simpler structures often precede more complex ones in both ontogeny and phylogeny if the former serve as building blocks for the latter. It is difficult to test these hypotheses experimentally in natural systems, so we used a computational system that exhibits evolutionary dynamics. We observed that ontogeny does indeed recapitulate phylogeny; traits that arose earlier in a lineage's history also tended to be expressed earlier in the development of individuals. The relative complexity of traits contributed substantially to this correlation, but a significant tendency toward recapitulation remained even after accounting for trait complexity. This additional effect provides evidence that selection against developmental disruption also contributed to the conservation of early stages in development.
Related Concept Videos
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Phylogeny
Microbial Phylogeny
Phylogenetic Trees
Phylogenetic Trees
Gene Duplication and Divergence
The duplicated copies of the gene are called Paralogs. Paralogs with similar sequences and functions form a gene family. Across several species, a large number of gene families are characterized.

