Flow characteristics of LIMA radial composite sequential bypass grafting and single LIMA and saphenous vein

J S Jung1, C H Chung, S H Lee

  • 1Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Anam Hospital, Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

Insights

Composite bypass grafting using the radial artery shows inferior hemodynamic flow compared to traditional single LIMA and saphenous vein grafts in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Further studies are needed to confirm long-term graft durability.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Vascular Grafting
  • Hemodynamics

Background:

  • Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) is a surgical technique used to bypass blocked coronary arteries without using cardiopulmonary bypass.
  • Graft selection is crucial for long-term patency and patient outcomes.
  • The left internal thoracic artery (LITA) and radial artery (RA) are commonly used arterial grafts, while the saphenous vein (SV) is a frequently used venous graft.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the hemodynamic flow characteristics of LIMA-radial artery composite sequential bypass grafting with single LIMA and saphenous vein sequential bypass grafting during OPCAB.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of different arterial and venous graft configurations in maintaining optimal blood flow.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective study involving 121 OPCAB patients divided into two groups: Group I (LITA-LAD and Ao-SV sequential grafting) and Group II (LITA-RA sequential grafting).
  • Hemodynamic parameters including mean flow, pulsatility index (PI), and backflow (BF) were measured using a Transit-time flow meter (TTFM).
  • In Group II, proximal and distal LITA flows were measured separately relative to the RA anastomosis.

Main Results:

  • The radial artery (RA) graft in Group II exhibited significantly lower mean flow (27.3 mL/min) and higher pulsatility index (PI) (4.1) compared to the saphenous vein (SV) graft in Group I (64.4 mL/min, PI 2.6).
  • In Group II, distal LITA flow (18.8 mL/min, PI 3.9) was lower than proximal LITA flow (37.3 mL/min, PI 2.3), indicating potential flow compromise.
  • Both LITA and RA grafts in Group II showed significantly different flow characteristics compared to the LITA-SV grafts in Group I (P<0.01).

Conclusions:

  • Composite LIMA-radial artery sequential bypass grafting demonstrates inferior hemodynamic flow characteristics compared to a strategy using single LIMA and separate aorta-SV bypass grafting.
  • The findings suggest potential challenges with the composite grafting technique in maintaining optimal graft perfusion.
  • Longer follow-up is necessary to determine the clinical implications of these hemodynamic differences on graft durability and long-term outcomes.
Abstract