Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Genesis of the T-wave through various modes of ventricular recovery patterns using the equivalent dipole layer model.

Computers in biology and medicine·2025
Same author

Trunk extensor muscle endurance and its relationship to action potential conduction velocity and spectral parameters estimated using high-density electromyography.

Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology·2023
Same author

Enhanced low-threshold motor unit capacity during endurance tasks in patients with spinal muscular atrophy using pyridostigmine.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2023
Same author

Author Correction: Modeling of intracranial tumor treating fields for the treatment of complex high-grade gliomas.

Scientific reports·2023
Same author

Modeling of intracranial tumor treating fields for the treatment of complex high-grade gliomas.

Scientific reports·2023
Same author

Incorporating structural abnormalities in equivalent dipole layer based ECG simulations.

Frontiers in physiology·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 23, 2025

Neuronavigated Focalized Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Administered During Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
09:33

Neuronavigated Focalized Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Administered During Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Published on: November 15, 2024

1.9K

Single-layer skull approximations perform well in transcranial direct current stimulation modeling.

Sumientra M Rampersad1, Dick F Stegeman, Thom F Oostendorp

  • 1Department of Neurology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. s.rampersad@neuro.umcn.nl

IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering : a Publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
|August 3, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Accurate skull modeling in transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is crucial. Simplified skull models can effectively represent tDCS effects if optimal conductivity values, based on the realistic skull’s radial conductivity, are used.

More Related Videos

Stimulation Location Determination using a 3D Digitizer with High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
07:20

Stimulation Location Determination using a 3D Digitizer with High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Published on: December 20, 2019

7.3K
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation tDCS in Mice
11:54

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation tDCS in Mice

Published on: September 23, 2018

14.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 23, 2025

Neuronavigated Focalized Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Administered During Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
09:33

Neuronavigated Focalized Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Administered During Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Published on: November 15, 2024

1.9K
Stimulation Location Determination using a 3D Digitizer with High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
07:20

Stimulation Location Determination using a 3D Digitizer with High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Published on: December 20, 2019

7.3K
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation tDCS in Mice
11:54

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation tDCS in Mice

Published on: September 23, 2018

14.9K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Biophysics
  • Computational Modeling

Background:

  • Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique.
  • Accurate modeling of the human skull is essential for precise tDCS simulations.
  • Current tDCS models often use simplified skull representations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the accuracy of different skull modeling approaches in tDCS simulations.
  • To evaluate single-layer isotropic and anisotropic skull approximations against a realistic multi-layer model.
  • To determine the impact of skull conductivity values on simulated current densities.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a spherical head model.
  • Implemented a realistic three-layer isotropic skull model.
  • Created single-layer isotropic and anisotropic skull approximations.
  • Simulated tDCS across a range of conductivity values.
  • Analyzed differences in resulting current densities.

Main Results:

  • Both single-layer isotropic and anisotropic approximations performed well under specific conductivity conditions.
  • Optimal conductivity values for approximations were strongly influenced by the equivalent radial conductivity of the multi-layer skull.
  • Differences in current densities were investigated across various conductivity scenarios.

Conclusions:

  • Simplified skull models (single-layer isotropic/anisotropic) can be viable for tDCS simulations.
  • The choice of conductivity values is critical for the accuracy of simplified skull models.
  • Equivalent radial conductivity of a multi-layer skull provides a basis for selecting optimal values in approximations.