Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

09:38
Assessing Species-specific Contributions To Craniofacial Development Using Quail-duck Chimeras
Published on: May 31, 2014
Ontogeny of aerodynamics in mallards: comparative performance and developmental implications
Terry R Dial1, Ashley M Heers, Bret W Tobalske
1Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84102, USA. terry_dial@brown.edu
The Journal of Experimental Biology
|August 3, 2012
Summary
Bird wing development shows similar aerodynamic trends in mallards and chukars, with feather microstructure, not gross morphology, driving improvements. Mallard wings develop flight capacity later than chukar wings, potentially influencing escape behaviors.
Area of Science:
- Comparative biomechanics
- Avian flight development
- Feather microstructure
Background:
- Wing morphology impacts bird flight performance and ecology.
- The developmental basis of aerodynamic capacity is not fully understood.
- Previous studies on chukar partridges showed increasing aerodynamic forces during ontogeny.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate aerodynamic force production during wing development in altricial mallards.
- To compare developmental patterns with precocial chukar partridges.
- To identify factors influencing aerodynamic capacity changes during ontogeny.
Main Methods:
- Used a propeller and force-plate model to measure aerodynamic forces in developing mallards.
- Analyzed gross wing morphology (aspect ratio, camber, porosity) and feather microstructure (unfurling, asymmetry, barbule overlap).
- Compared developmental timing of aerodynamic force production between mallards and chukars.
Main Results:
- Mallard wing aerodynamic force coefficients (C(V), C(H)) and ratios (C(V):C(H)) increased with age, mirroring chukar trends.
- Feather microstructure, including unfurling, stiffness, and reduced porosity, correlated positively with aerodynamic performance.
- Mallard wings showed delayed aerodynamic development, with significant improvement occurring just before fledging, unlike early development in chukars.
Conclusions:
- Feather microstructure, not gross morphology, explains intraspecific variation in developing mallard flight capacity.
- Species-specific differences in flight development timing (heterochrony) are linked to juvenile escape strategies.
- Further research should explore how developmental timing influences adult flight repertoires in different bird species.
Related Concept Videos
Convergent Evolution
Evolution shapes the features of organisms over time, ensuring that they are suited for the environments in which they live. Sometimes, selection pressure leads to the rise of similar but unrelated adaptations in organisms with no recent common ancestors, a process known as convergent evolution.
Limits to Natural Selection
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD
A complete procedure of testing a hypothesis about a population mean when the population standard deviation is unknown is explained here.
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used; instead...
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used; instead...

