Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Primary versus secondary intraorbital implants.

T J Smit1, L Koornneef, M P Mourits

  • 1Orbital Center of the Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
|January 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Inflation of 430-parsec bipolar radio bubbles in the Galactic Centre by an energetic event.

Nature·2019
Same author

[The impact of fireworks: the context of facial trauma].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde·2017
Same author

[Diagnosis and treatment of orbital cellulitis].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2017
Same author

Does early response to intravenous glucocorticoids predict the final outcome in patients with moderate-to-severe and active Graves' orbitopathy?

Journal of endocrinological investigation·2017
Same author

Is Implicit Motor Learning Preserved after Stroke? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

PloS one·2016
Same author

Seven-year follow-up of unilateral multifocal pseudophakia in a child.

International ophthalmology·2016

Primary intraorbital implants inserted immediately after enucleation offer superior cosmetic outcomes compared to secondary implants. This retrospective study of 114 patients highlights the advantages of immediate implant placement for improved patient results.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Surgical Outcomes
  • Prosthetics

Background:

  • Enucleation, the surgical removal of the eyeball, often necessitates orbital implant placement for cosmetic restoration.
  • Both primary (immediate) and secondary (delayed) orbital implants are utilized, with varying outcomes.
  • Optimizing cosmetic results after enucleation is a key goal in ophthalmic reconstructive surgery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the surgical outcomes and cosmetic results of primary versus secondary intraorbital implants following enucleation.
  • To determine if immediate implant placement offers advantages over delayed placement.
  • To evaluate the need for secondary procedures to achieve satisfactory cosmetic results.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 114 patients who underwent enucleation and received orbital implants.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Categorization of patients into primary implant (n=44) and secondary implant (n=70) groups.
  • Comparison of the incidence of additional surgical procedures required for cosmetic enhancement between the two groups.

    • Main Results:

    • Patients receiving primary implants required fewer additional procedures (11%) for satisfactory cosmetic results compared to those with secondary implants (49%).
    • Immediate implant insertion demonstrated a significantly lower rate of revision surgeries.
    • The study indicates a clear benefit of primary implant placement in achieving better aesthetic outcomes.

    Conclusions:

    • Immediate (primary) orbital implant placement after enucleation is associated with superior cosmetic results and a reduced need for subsequent surgical interventions.
    • Delayed (secondary) implant placement often necessitates further procedures to achieve optimal aesthetic outcomes.
    • Ophthalmic surgeons should consider the advantages of primary implant insertion for improved patient satisfaction and functional restoration.