Effects of carotid artery stenosis treatment on blood pressure
Joonho Chung1, Byung Moon Kim, Ho Kyu Paik
1Department of Neurosurgery, Inha University School of Medicine and Hospital, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Insights
Carotid artery stenting (CAS) demonstrated a greater blood pressure (BP) reduction than carotid endarterectomy (CEA) at one year. CAS also resulted in more patients achieving normotensive BP levels post-procedure.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Cardiology
- Interventional Neurology
Background:
- Carotid artery stenosis poses a significant risk for stroke.
- Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) are primary interventions for managing carotid artery stenosis.
- The long-term impact of these procedures on blood pressure (BP) requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the long-term effects of CEA and CAS on blood pressure (BP).
- To evaluate BP reduction and normotensive rates following CEA versus CAS.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective study included 102 patients (59 CEA, 43 CAS) with at least 1-year follow-up.
- Patients were analyzed based on treatment group (CEA or CAS).
- Percentage change in BP decrement and the proportion of normotensive patients were compared pre- and post-procedure.
Main Results:
- Both CEA and CAS significantly reduced BP from baseline.
- At 1-year follow-up, CAS showed a greater BP decrement (systolic: 9.6%, diastolic: 12.8%) compared to CEA (systolic: 5.9%, diastolic: 8.1%).
- A higher percentage of patients achieved normotensive BP in the CAS group (46.5%) versus the CEA group (22.0%).
Conclusions:
- Both carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting exert beneficial BP-lowering effects.
- Carotid artery stenting appears to offer superior blood pressure management compared to carotid endarterectomy at the 1-year mark.
Object:
The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the long-term effects of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) on blood pressure (BP).
Methods:
Between January 2003 and December 2009, 134 patients underwent 145 procedures for treatment of carotid artery stenosis. Patients with at least 1 year of clinical and radiographic follow-up after treatment were included in this study. A total of 102 patients met this criterion and were placed in the CEA group (n = 59) or the CAS group (n = 43) according to their treatment. The percentage change in BP decrement and the number of patients with a normotensive BP were evaluated and compared between the groups.
Results:
There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to baseline characteristics. Compared with the pretreatment BP, the follow-up BPs were significantly decreased in both groups. At the 1-year followup, the percentage change in the BP decrement was greater in the CAS group (percentage change: systolic BP 9.6% and diastolic BP 12.8%) than in the CEA group (percentage change: systolic BP 5.9% [p = 0.035] and diastolic BP = 8.1% [p = 0.049]), and there were more patients with a normotensive BP in the CAS group (46.5%) than in the CEA group (22.0%, p = 0.012).
Conclusions:
Both CEA and CAS have BP-lowering effects. Carotid artery stenting seems to have a better effect than CEA on BP at the 1-year follow-up.
Related Concept Videos
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Hypertension IV: Drug Therapy and Lifestyle Modifications
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Calcium Channel Blockers
TKIs, such as imatinib (Gleevec), are particularly effective in tackling the growth and mitogenic factors that become upregulated in PAH patients. These factors contribute to the...
Hypertension V: Nursing Management
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
