Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

Quantification of the Immunosuppressant Tacrolimus on Dried Blood Spots Using LC-MS/MS
Published on: November 8, 2015
Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium immunosuppression in renal transplant patients: efficacy and dosing
Matthew Cooper1, Maurizio Salvadori, Klemens Budde
1Division of Transplantation, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. mcooper@smail.umaryland.edu
Abstract:
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), a mycophenolic acid (MPA) formulation, has improved both short- and long-term outcomes following renal transplantation, but is often associated with gastrointestinal (GI) complications that can lead to dose reduction or discontinuation, potentially jeopardizing patient outcomes. Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) delivers equivalent MPA exposure to MMF and offers the potential to reduce GI burden (while maintaining patient safety). Here we review the efficacy of EC-MPS compared with MMF in renal transplant patients in terms of biopsy-proven acute rejection and graft loss, and examine the use of EC-MPS in newer regimens such as intensified dosing and calcineurin inhibitor minimization.
Insights
Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) offers a safer alternative to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for renal transplant patients, reducing gastrointestinal issues without compromising efficacy in preventing rejection or graft loss.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Immunosuppression
- Transplantation
Background:
- Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) improves renal transplant outcomes but causes gastrointestinal (GI) complications.
- These GI issues can necessitate dose reduction, risking patient outcomes.
- Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) provides equivalent mycophenolic acid (MPA) exposure to MMF.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the efficacy of EC-MPS versus MMF in renal transplant patients.
- To assess EC-MPS's impact on biopsy-proven acute rejection and graft loss.
- To examine EC-MPS use in intensified dosing and calcineurin inhibitor minimization regimens.
Main Methods:
- Review of clinical studies comparing EC-MPS and MMF in renal transplantation.
- Analysis of outcomes including acute rejection rates and graft survival.
- Evaluation of EC-MPS in novel immunosuppressive strategies.
Main Results:
- EC-MPS demonstrates comparable efficacy to MMF in preventing acute rejection and graft loss.
- EC-MPS potentially reduces the gastrointestinal burden associated with MMF.
- EC-MPS is suitable for use in advanced immunosuppressive protocols.
Conclusions:
- EC-MPS is an effective and potentially better-tolerated alternative to MMF for renal transplant recipients.
- EC-MPS maintains patient safety and graft outcomes while mitigating GI side effects.
- EC-MPS offers flexibility in optimizing immunosuppression in renal transplantation.
Related Concept Videos
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Dose Adjustments Based on Drug Clearance and Elimination Rate Constant
Kidney Transplant III: Nursing Management
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Intermittent IV Infusions
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Measurement of Serum Creatinine Concentration and Clearance
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Immunomodulatory Agents

