Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Binomial Probability Distribution01:15

Binomial Probability Distribution

A binomial distribution is a probability distribution for a procedure with a fixed number of trials, where each trial can have only two outcomes.
The outcomes of a binomial experiment fit a binomial probability distribution. A statistical experiment can be classified as a binomial experiment if the following conditions are met:
There are a fixed number of trials. Think of trials as repetitions of an experiment. The letter n denotes the number of trials.
There are only two possible outcomes,...
Odds Ratio01:09

Odds Ratio

The odds ratio (OR) is a statistical measure used extensively in epidemiology and research to quantify the strength of association between exposure and outcome across different groups. Unlike relative risk, which compares the probabilities of an event occurring, the odds ratio compares the odds of an event occurring in the exposed group to the odds of it occurring in the unexposed group. The odds, in this context, are calculated as the probability of the event happening divided by the...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least squares (OLS)...
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Evaluation of Alternative Smoking Duration Criteria for Lung Cancer Screening.

JAMA internal medicine·2026
Same author

Increasing power and robustness in screening trials by testing stored specimens in the control arm.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same author

Benefits and Harms of Immediate Versus Delayed Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 : A Target Trial Emulation.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same author

Sex differences in cancer incidence persist across race and ethnicity.

Biology of sex differences·2026
Same author

Smoking hot joint models for attrition bias-XMAR-ks the spot.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Interpretable Bayesian Modeling for Multireader Multicase Studies: Addressing Overdispersion and Limited Sample Size in Diagnostic Enhancement Evaluation.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Sequential Multiple Hypotheses Testing for Concomitant Vaccine Safety Surveillance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Novel Distance Regression for Repeated Outcomes With Missing Data: Applications to Longitudinal and Crossover Studies of Microbiome Beta-Diversity.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 19, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

A general binomial regression model to estimate standardized risk differences from binary response data.

Stephanie A Kovalchik1, Ravi Varadhan, Barbara Fetterman

  • 1Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, U.S.A. kovalchiksa@nih.gov

Statistics in Medicine
|August 7, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new linear-expit regression model (LEXPIT) accurately estimates absolute risk for binary outcomes. This method improves upon logistic regression, revealing increased cervical precancer risk in certain human papillomavirus-negative cases.

More Related Videos

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 19, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Medical Informatics

Background:

  • Estimating absolute risks and risk differences is crucial for assessing the impact of biomedical research.
  • Existing regression models may not fully capture complex risk associations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a novel linear-expit regression model (LEXPIT) for estimating absolute risk from binary outcomes.
  • To generalize binomial linear and logistic regression models to incorporate linear and nonlinear risk effects.

Main Methods:

  • Developed the LEXPIT model, a generalization of binomial linear and logistic regression.
  • Implemented a constrained maximum likelihood estimation algorithm for feasible risk estimates.
  • Applied the LEXPIT model to a large dataset of women undergoing cervical cancer screening.

Main Results:

  • The LEXPIT model provides feasible and consistent risk estimators, validated through simulations.
  • LEXPIT identified an increased risk of cervical precancer in human papillomavirus-negative women with abnormal Pap tests, a finding missed by logistic regression.
  • An R package (blm) is available for implementing the LEXPIT model.

Conclusions:

  • The LEXPIT model offers a robust and more sensitive approach for estimating absolute risk in epidemiological studies.
  • LEXPIT enhances the ability to detect risk associations, particularly when adjusting for multiple confounding variables.
  • The developed methodology and software facilitate improved risk assessment in clinical and population health research.