Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

07:30
A Test Bed to Examine Helmet Fit and Retention and Biomechanical Measures of Head and Neck Injury in Simulated Impact
Published on: September 21, 2017
Investigation on occupant ejection in high severity rear impact based on post mortem human subject sled tests
Philippe Petit1, Carole Luet, Pascal Potier
1LAB PSA-Peugeot Citroën Renault, Nanterre, France. Philippe.p.petit@lab-france.com
Stapp Car Crash Journal
|August 8, 2012
Summary
Rear impact occupant protection faces a dilemma: seat deformation absorbs energy but can cause ejection. This study tested Post Mortem Human Subjects (PMHS) in sled tests to understand ejection risks in rear-end collisions.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Crash Safety Engineering
- Forensic Science
Background:
- Occupant protection in rear impacts presents a challenge balancing energy absorption and ejection risk.
- Occupant ejection significantly increases the risk of severe injury and fatality in traffic accidents.
- Previous research lacks full-scale rear impact tests with Post Mortem Human Subjects (PMHS) leading to ejection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the conditions leading to occupant ejection in rear impact scenarios using Post Mortem Human Subjects (PMHS).
- To systematically evaluate the influence of seat design parameters and occupant characteristics on ejection likelihood.
- To identify critical factors contributing to rearward seat ejection in simulated car crashes.
Main Methods:
- Conducted 10 sled tests on 3 belted PMHS with a simplified seat model.
- Varied parameters including seatback angle, range of motion, occupant size, seatbelt slack, seatback stiffness, and headrest use.
- Maintained a constant rear impact pulse (17 G peak acceleration, 30 ms rise time, 95 ms duration).
Main Results:
- Rearward seat ejection of a Post Mortem Human Subject (PMHS) was observed only for the 95th percentile occupant under specific conditions: 22° initial seatback angle, 44° range of motion, and no headrest.
- Activating the seatbelt pretensioner did not prevent ejection under these conditions.
- The 50th percentile belted occupant did not experience rearward seat ejection in tests with a headrest.
Conclusions:
- Specific geometric configurations (large occupant, reclined seat, high seatback motion, no headrest) increase rearward ejection risk in rear impacts.
- Headrests play a crucial role in preventing occupant ejection in rear-end collisions.
- Findings provide valuable data for improving vehicle seat and restraint system design for enhanced occupant safety.

