Related Experiment Videos
Mediators of change in psychosocial interventions for cancer patients: a systematic review
Anne Moyer1, Matthew Goldenberg, Matthew A Hall
1Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA. anne.moyer@sunysb.edu
Abstract:
Careful reviews and meta-analyses have made valuable contributions to understanding the efficacy of psychosocial interventions for cancer patients. An important next step is to determine the mediators that explain the influence of efficacious interventions on outcomes. This systematic review summarizes tests of mediating variables from twenty-two projects conducted from 1989-2010. Although all authors provided some type of rationale for considering particular mediating relationships, the investigations varied widely with respect to the extent to which formal theoretical constructs were tested, the type and goals of the interventions studied, and the broad types of outcomes and potential mediators examined. Although there was some evidence supporting selected mediating relationships, with positive findings often found when mediating variables represented behaviors targeted by an intervention, the findings were mixed. Expanding the focus of research to include mechanisms in psychosocial oncology intervention research is necessary for providing a unified picture of how mediating relationships may be operating in this field.
Insights
Identifying mediators of psychosocial interventions for cancer patients is crucial. While some evidence supports specific mediating behaviors, overall findings were mixed, necessitating further research into intervention mechanisms.
Area of Science:
- Psychosocial Oncology
- Behavioral Medicine
- Cancer Survivorship
Background:
- Efficacy of psychosocial interventions for cancer patients is established.
- Understanding mediators is the next critical step in this research area.
- Previous reviews and meta-analyses have focused on intervention efficacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review studies testing mediating variables in psychosocial oncology interventions.
- To examine the diversity in theoretical constructs, interventions, outcomes, and mediators studied.
- To synthesize evidence on the role of mediators in explaining intervention effects.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of 22 projects conducted between 1989 and 2010.
- Analysis of studies that tested mediating variables in psychosocial interventions for cancer patients.
- Assessment of the theoretical grounding and methodological diversity of included studies.
Main Results:
- Evidence supporting specific mediating relationships was found, particularly for behavioral mediators targeted by interventions.
- Findings regarding mediating variables were mixed across the reviewed studies.
- Significant variation existed in the theoretical rigor and scope of the investigated mediating relationships.
Conclusions:
- Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying psychosocial interventions in cancer care.
- Expanding the focus to include mediating mechanisms is essential for a comprehensive understanding.
- A unified picture of mediating relationships is necessary for advancing psychosocial oncology.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques VI
Motivation and Self-Determination
Motivation, the driving force behind behavior, plays a pivotal role at every stage of the change process. The research...
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
Treatment Resistant Cancers