Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Automated Microbial Diagnostics01:24

Automated Microbial Diagnostics

Automated diagnostic analyzers have transformed clinical microbiology by providing rapid and reliable methods for pathogen identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing. Among these systems, the Vitek 2 is widely used because it automates the traditionally labor-intensive processes of microbial identification (ID) and antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST), delivering standardized and timely results that are essential for effective patient care.Microbial Identification with ID CardsThe...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reinforcement learning control of quantum error correction.

Nature·2026
Same author

A Novel Digital Phenotype for Burn Sepsis: Leveraging Electronic Health Record Data and Natural Language Processing to Improve Case Definition.

Applied clinical informatics·2026
Same author

Formative research for a One Health, animal-inclusive approach to Community-Led Total Sanitation in rural Mali.

One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
Same author

A spinal substrate for modular control of natural behavior.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Characterizing β-lactam allergy prevalence among patients receiving infectious disease specialty care within a large US healthcare system in Washington.

JAC-antimicrobial resistance·2026
Same author

In vitro evaluation of anti-HIV radioimmunoconjugates labeled with astatine-211, thorium-227 and actinium-225.

Nuclear medicine and biology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 19, 2026

A Semi-automated Approach to Preparing Antibody Cocktails for Immunophenotypic Analysis of Human Peripheral Blood
08:17

A Semi-automated Approach to Preparing Antibody Cocktails for Immunophenotypic Analysis of Human Peripheral Blood

Published on: February 8, 2016

Exponential error reduction in pretransfusion testing with automation.

Susan F South1, Tony S Casina, Lily Li

  • 1Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Raritan, New Jersey 08869, USA.

Transfusion
|August 14, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Automated blood group and antibody screen (G&S) methods significantly reduce errors in pretransfusion testing compared to manual methods. This automation enhances blood transfusion safety by minimizing human error in laboratory processes.

More Related Videos

Continuous Manual Exchange Transfusion for Patients with Sickle Cell Disease: An Efficient Method to Avoid Iron Overload
05:23

Continuous Manual Exchange Transfusion for Patients with Sickle Cell Disease: An Efficient Method to Avoid Iron Overload

Published on: March 14, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 19, 2026

A Semi-automated Approach to Preparing Antibody Cocktails for Immunophenotypic Analysis of Human Peripheral Blood
08:17

A Semi-automated Approach to Preparing Antibody Cocktails for Immunophenotypic Analysis of Human Peripheral Blood

Published on: February 8, 2016

Continuous Manual Exchange Transfusion for Patients with Sickle Cell Disease: An Efficient Method to Avoid Iron Overload
05:23

Continuous Manual Exchange Transfusion for Patients with Sickle Cell Disease: An Efficient Method to Avoid Iron Overload

Published on: March 14, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Transfusion Medicine
  • Laboratory Automation
  • Patient Safety

Background:

  • Blood transfusion safety is paramount in transfusion services.
  • Pretransfusion testing is crucial for vein-to-vein safety.
  • Manual testing methods contribute to transfusion-related errors, necessitating automation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the error potentials of manual (tile and tube) versus automated (ID-GelStation and AutoVue Innova) blood group and antibody screen (G&S) methods.
  • To evaluate the impact of automation on reducing human error in pretransfusion testing.

Main Methods:

  • Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) was employed.
  • Routine G&S processes in seven transfusion service laboratories were analyzed.
  • Laboratories utilized either manual or automated G&S methods.

Main Results:

  • Manual methods involved 22–39 process steps; automated methods used 6–8 steps.
  • Risk Priority Numbers (RPNs) for manual methods ranged from 5304 to 10,976.
  • Automated methods showed significantly lower RPNs (129–436) and a 90%–98% reduction in defect opportunities.

Conclusions:

  • Automation dramatically reduces error potentials in pretransfusion testing.
  • Implementing automated G&S methods can substantially improve blood transfusion safety.
  • Quantitative evidence supports the transformation of pretransfusion testing through automation.