Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Chapter 14: Comparing the adequacy of carcinogenesis models in estimating U.S. population rates for lung cancer
Theodore R Holford1, David T Levy
1Yale School of Public Health, 60 College St., New Haven, CT 06520, USA. theodore.holford@yale.edu
Abstract:
The relationship between smoking and lung cancer is well established and cohort studies provide estimates of risk for individual cohorts. While population trends are qualitatively consistent with smoking trends, the rates do not agree well with results from analytical studies. Four carcinogenesis models for the effect of smoking on lung cancer mortality were used to estimate lung cancer mortality rates for U.S. males: two-stage clonal expansion and multistage models using parameters estimated from two Cancer Prevention Studies (CPS I and CPS II). Calibration was essential to adjust for both shift and temporal trend. The age-period-cohort model was used for calibration. Overall, models using parameters derived from CPS I performed best, and the corresponding two-stage clonal expansion model was best overall. However, temporal calibration did significantly improve agreement with the population rates, especially the effect of age and cohort.
Related Concept Videos
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Cancer Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Mouse Models of Cancer Study
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...
