Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Bias

Bias

Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...

Systematic Sampling Method

Systematic Sampling Method

Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:

Sampling Plans

Sampling Plans

Sampling is a crucial step in analytical chemistry, allowing researchers to collect representative data from a large population. Common sampling methods include random, judgmental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling.
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

Random Sampling Method

Random Sampling Method

Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest. Among the various sampling methods used by...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Exploring metabolism-growth relationships within and across individual fish.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026

Same author

Roadkill reimagined: a review of innovative scientific use and value of animals killed by vehicular traffic.

Biology letters·2026

Same author

Oncogenic stress alters predator-prey interactions between a globally invasive and a native planaria species.

iScience·2025

Same author

Consequences of Cancer on Zebrafish <i>Danio rerio</i>: Insights Into Sex Determination, Sex Ratio, and Offspring Survival.

Ecology and evolution·2025

Same author

Towards a more robust comparative oncology: a Bayesian reanalysis of Peto's paradox and discussion of comparative cancer risk studies in vertebrates.

Royal Society open science·2025

Same author

Comparative display behaviour of the native Iguana delicatissima with the non-native Iguana in the Guadeloupe Archipelago (Lesser Antilles).

Zoology (Jena, Germany)·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 19, 2026

Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot

Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot

Published on: January 7, 2019

Are most samples of animals systematically biased? Consistent individual trait differences bias samples despite

¹Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Science, Deakin University, Geelong, 3216, Australia. pete.biro@deakin.edu.au

|August 14, 2012

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Hidden traits can bias animal sampling. Fast-growing fish were twice as likely to be caught, revealing significant sampling bias related to life history traits. This impacts ecological studies.

More Related Videos

Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes

Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes

Published on: August 29, 2016

Sampling Strategies and Processing of Biobank Tissue Samples from Porcine Biomedical Models

Sampling Strategies and Processing of Biobank Tissue Samples from Porcine Biomedical Models

Published on: March 6, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 19, 2026

Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot

Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot

Published on: January 7, 2019

Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes

Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes

Published on: August 29, 2016

Sampling Strategies and Processing of Biobank Tissue Samples from Porcine Biomedical Models

Sampling Strategies and Processing of Biobank Tissue Samples from Porcine Biomedical Models

Published on: March 6, 2018

Area of Science:

Ecology
Animal Behavior
Population Biology

Background:

Biological sampling aims for randomness, but 'hidden' traits can introduce bias.
Behavioral traits influencing catchability may correlate with physiological and life history traits.
Existing knowledge on sampling bias is limited due to reliance on potentially biased samples.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the extent of sampling bias related to animal traits.
To determine if growth rate, a life history trait, influences sampling probability.
To assess the implications of trait-based sampling bias on ecological inferences.

Main Methods:

Created controlled fish populations with known densities of slow, intermediate, and fast-growing individuals.
Employed non-size-selective sampling methods across four fishless lakes.
Quantified the relative catchability of fish with different growth rates.

Main Results:

Fast-growing fish were up to twice as likely to be sampled compared to slower-growing fish.
Demonstrated substantial and systematic sampling bias linked to growth rate.
Highlighted the potential for bias in other correlated traits (behavioral, physiological).

Conclusions:

Sampling bias related to life history traits like growth rate is significant.
Widespread correlations between traits suggest many animal samples may be systematically biased.
Minimizing trait-based sampling bias is crucial for accurate population structure and abundance inferences.