Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Left atrial appendage occlusion and ligation devices: what is available, how to implement them, and how to manage and
Arash Aryana1, Eduardo B Saad, André d'Avila
1Regional Cardiology Associates and Mercy Heart & Vascular Institute, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Insights
Left atrial appendage (LAA) exclusion can prevent stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, especially those unable to take anticoagulants. However, long-term safety and efficacy data for percutaneous LAA closure are still insufficient for widespread use.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia linked to a high risk of stroke, often caused by clots in the left atrial appendage (LAA).
- LAA thrombi are implicated in over 90% of embolic events in AF patients.
- Surgical LAA ligation or excision is standard during mitral valve surgery or Maze procedures for AF.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current strategies for left atrial appendage (LAA) exclusion in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients.
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of LAA exclusion as an alternative to oral anticoagulation (OAC) for stroke prevention.
- To identify the need for further research on LAA occlusion and ligation techniques.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on surgical and percutaneous LAA exclusion methods.
- Analysis of current evidence regarding the effectiveness of LAA ligation and occlusion devices.
- Discussion of LAA exclusion in the context of OAC contraindications and post-catheter ablation management.
Main Results:
- LAA exclusion, including surgical ligation, amputation, and percutaneous device closure, offers stroke protection in selected AF patients, particularly those with OAC contraindications.
- Percutaneous LAA closure and ligation studies show promising short-term results.
- Long-term efficacy and safety data for percutaneous LAA exclusion are currently insufficient for broad recommendation.
Conclusions:
- LAA exclusion is a reasonable option for stroke prevention in AF patients with contraindications to OAC.
- Further randomized trials are necessary to establish the long-term safety and efficacy of percutaneous LAA occlusion and ligation.
- The role of LAA occlusion/ligation in patients with successful AF catheter ablation requires further investigation, as antiplatelet therapy may suffice.
Opinion Statement:
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia worldwide, and it is associated with an elevated risk of thromboembolic events, including ischemic stroke. Evidence suggests that at least 90 % of left atrial thrombi discovered in patients with AF are localized to the left atrial appendage (LAA). Surgical ligation or excision of the LAA is considered the standard of care in patients who undergo mitral valve surgery or as an adjunct to a surgical Maze procedure for treatment of AF. In addition, in selected patients with AF and an elevated risk of thromboembolic events, particularly in those with contraindication to oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy, it is reasonable to consider LAA exclusion to offer protection against ischemic stroke and other embolic complications. This can be achieved through a number of different strategies, including surgical amputation or ligation of the LAA, percutaneous endocardial occlusion of the LAA by deployment of occlusive devices, and also ligation of the LAA via a closed-chest, percutaneous, epicardial catheter-based approach in select patients. Although results from several recent percutaneous LAA closure and ligation studies are highly promising, the evidence for long-term efficacy and safety is insufficient to presently recommend this approach to all patients other than those in whom long-term OAC is contraindicated. Future randomized studies are required to further address the long-term safety and efficacy of these therapeutic options. Finally, the role for LAA occlusion and ligation seems less clear in patients who undergo successful catheter ablation of AF, since at least in a subgroup of these patients antiplatelet therapy alone has been shown to be sufficient.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care

