Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Using Optogenetics to Reverse Neuroplasticity and Inhibit Cocaine Seeking in Rats
Published on: October 5, 2021
Neuroenhancers, addiction and research ethics
1Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Missionsstrasse 24, CH-4055 Basel, Basel-Stadt, Switzerland. davidmartinshaw@gmail.com
Abstract:
In their recent paper in this journal, Heinz and colleagues accuse proponents of cognitive enhancement of making two unjustified assumptions. The first of these is the assumption that neuroenhancing drugs will be safe; the second is that research into cognitive enhancement does not pose particular ethical problems. Heinz and colleagues argue that both these assumptions are false. Here, I argue that these assumptions are in fact correct, and that Heinz and colleagues themselves make several assumptions that undermine their argument. Neuroenhancement does raise several ethical concerns, but safety and research in this area pose no unique difficulties.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cognitive Enhancers: Cholinesterase Inhibitors and NMDA Receptor Antagonists
Drug Abuse and Addiction: Pharmacological Phenomena
Ethics in Research
CNS Stimulants: Cocaine, Amphetamines and Cannabinoids
Stimulants
Cocaine can be administered via snorting, injection, or smoking. It primarily functions by blocking the reuptake of dopamine, resulting in a euphoric high characterized by an intense sensation of happiness and...
Drugs Affecting Neurotransmitter Synthesis

