Analysis of the adaptation capacity of Staphylococcus aureus to commonly used antiseptics by microplate laser

C Wiegand1, M Abel, P Ruth

  • 1Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Jena, Jena, Germany. C.Wiegand@med.uni-jena.de

Abstract

Insights

Repeated exposure to common antiseptics like polihexanide and chlorhexidine did not lead to Staphylococcus aureus adaptation. This suggests these antiseptics remain effective against bacterial resistance in wound healing.

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Antimicrobial resistance
  • Wound healing

Background:

  • Bacterial colonization and infection impede wound healing.
  • Increasing antibiotic resistance necessitates alternative antimicrobial strategies.
  • Antiseptics offer broad-spectrum activity, but concerns exist regarding potential bacterial adaptation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the in vitro capacity of common antiseptics to induce bacterial adaptation.
  • To assess the development of reduced susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus upon repeated exposure to antiseptics.

Main Methods:

  • Staphylococcus aureus was repeatedly incubated with the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of various antiseptics over 100 days.
  • Microplate laser nephelometry was used to monitor changes in dose-response curves and calculate IC50 values.
  • The study analyzed adaptation to silver nitrate, polihexanide, octenidine, chlorhexidine, and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)-iodine.

Main Results:

  • Staphylococcus aureus rapidly adapted to mupirocin, showing increased IC50 values.
  • A significant increase in IC50 was observed for silver nitrate, indicating adaptation.
  • No significant changes in IC50 were observed for polihexanide or chlorhexidine.
  • Octenidine showed a marginal increase in IC50, while PVP-iodine demonstrated a decrease in IC50.

Conclusions:

  • Repeated exposure of Staphylococcus aureus to polihexanide, chlorhexidine, octenidine, and PVP-iodine did not result in significant bacterial adaptation.
  • These findings suggest that polihexanide, chlorhexidine, octenidine, and PVP-iodine may be reliable options for managing bacterial infections in compromised wound healing.
  • Further research is warranted to confirm these in vitro findings in clinical settings.