Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Conducting a paediatric multi-centre RCT with an industry partner: challenges and lessons learned
Jessica Maskell1, Peter Newcombe, Graham Martin
1Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. jessica.jameschadwick@uqconnect.edu.au
Insights
Conducting multi-centred research with industry partners presents unique challenges. This study highlights key considerations for successful collaboration, ethical approvals, and managing expectations in paediatric burn scar research.
Area of Science:
- Paediatric Burn Scar Management
- Cosmetic Camouflage Research
- Psychosocial Functioning
Background:
- Multi-centred research offers benefits like larger sample sizes and enhanced statistical power.
- Implementing multi-centred studies involves numerous planning and execution considerations.
- This study focused on a cosmetic camouflage product for paediatric burn scarring.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the challenges and successes of planning and implementing a multi-centred prospective randomised control trial.
- To investigate the impact of a cosmetic camouflage product on psychosocial functioning in children and adolescents with burn scarring.
- To outline lessons learned and recommendations for future multi-centred research involving industry partners.
Main Methods:
- A prospective randomised control trial was conducted across six Australian and New Zealand paediatric burn units.
- The study involved collaboration with an industry partner, introducing specific complexities.
- Ethical and institutional approval processes were navigated, involving multiple stakeholders.
Main Results:
- Collaboration with industry partners introduced complexities due to differing priorities and expectations.
- Navigating multifaceted ethical and institutional approval processes was a significant undertaking.
- The study identified challenges and successes in managing stakeholder expectations and research governance.
Conclusions:
- Effective multi-centred research with industry partners requires clear communication and defined roles.
- Recommendations include regular reporting to industry partners and prompt resolution of concerns.
- Utilising single ethical review where available and providing basic research education can streamline processes.
Abstract:
There are many benefits of multi-centred research including large sample sizes, statistical power, timely recruitment and generalisability of results. However, there are numerous considerations when planning and implementing a multi-centred study. This article reviews the challenges and successes of planning and implementing a multi-centred prospective randomised control trial involving an industry partner. The research investigated the impact on psychosocial functioning of a cosmetic camouflage product for children and adolescents with burn scarring. Multi-centred studies commonly have many stakeholders. Within this study, six Australian and New Zealand paediatric burn units as well as an industry partner were involved. The inclusion of an industry partner added complexities as they brought different priorities and expectations to the research. Further, multifaceted ethical and institutional approval processes needed to be negotiated. The challenges, successes, lessons learned and recommendations from this study regarding Australian and New Zealand ethics and research governance approval processes, collaboration with industry partners and the management of differing expectations will be outlined. Recommendations for future multi-centred research with industry partners include provision of regular written reports for the industry partner; continual monitoring and prompt resolution of concerns; basic research practices education for industry partners; minimisation of industry partner contact with participants; clear roles and responsibilities of all stakeholders and utilisation of single ethical review if available.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Preclinical Development: Overview
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution

