Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Molecular and Ionic Solids02:54

Molecular and Ionic Solids

Crystalline solids are divided into four types: molecular, ionic, metallic, and covalent network based on the type of constituent units and their interparticle interactions.
Molecular Solids
Molecular crystalline solids, such as ice, sucrose (table sugar), and iodine, are solids that are composed of neutral molecules as their constituent units. These molecules are held together by weak intermolecular forces such as London dispersion forces, dipole-dipole interactions, or hydrogen bonds, which...
Network Covalent Solids02:18

Network Covalent Solids

Network covalent solids contain a three-dimensional network of covalently bonded atoms as found in the crystal structures of nonmetals like diamond, graphite, silicon, and some covalent compounds, such as silicon dioxide (sand) and silicon carbide (carborundum, the abrasive on sandpaper). Many minerals have networks of covalent bonds.
To break or to melt a covalent network solid, covalent bonds must be broken. Because covalent bonds are relatively strong, covalent network solids are typically...
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules02:35

Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules

Noncovalent attractions are associations within and between molecules that influence the shape and structural stability of complexes. These interactions differ from covalent bonding in that they do not involve sharing of electrons.
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules02:35

Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules

Noncovalent attractions are associations within and between molecules that influence the shape and structural stability of complexes. These interactions differ from covalent bonding in that they do not involve sharing of electrons.
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
Intermolecular Forces03:13

Intermolecular Forces

Atoms and molecules interact through bonds (or forces): intramolecular and intermolecular. The forces are electrostatic as they arise from interactions (attractive or repulsive) between charged species (permanent, partial, or temporary charges) and exist with varying strengths between ions, polar, nonpolar, and neutral molecules. The different types of intermolecular forces are ion–dipole, dipole–dipole, hydrogen bonds, and dispersion; among these, dipole–dipole, hydrogen bonds, and dispersion...
Intermolecular Forces03:13

Intermolecular Forces

Atoms and molecules interact through bonds (or forces): intramolecular and intermolecular. The forces are electrostatic as they arise from interactions (attractive or repulsive) between charged species (permanent, partial, or temporary charges) and exist with varying strengths between ions, polar, nonpolar, and neutral molecules. The different types of intermolecular forces are ion–dipole, dipole–dipole, hydrogen bonds, and dispersion; among these, dipole–dipole, hydrogen bonds, and dispersion...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Best practices in `0 K' DFT energy calculations on molecular crystal structures.

Acta crystallographica. Section C, Structural chemistry·2026
Same author

The effects of dispersion damping and three-body interactions for accurate layered-material exfoliation energies.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2026
Same author

Consistent GMTKN55 and molecular-crystal accuracy using minimally empirical DFT with XDM(Z) dispersion.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2026
Same author

Einstein-Debye model for density-functional prediction of vibrational free energies of molecular crystals.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2026
Same author

Measuring the molecular origins of stiffness in organic semiconductors.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

WTMAD-4: a fair weighting scheme for GMTKN55.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 19, 2026

Covalent Attachment of Single Molecules for AFM-based Force Spectroscopy
10:37

Covalent Attachment of Single Molecules for AFM-based Force Spectroscopy

Published on: March 16, 2020

A benchmark for non-covalent interactions in solids.

A Otero-de-la-Roza1, Erin R Johnson

  • 1Chemistry and Chemical Biology, School of Natural Sciences, University of California, Merced, 5200 North Lake Road, Merced, California 95343, USA. aoterodelaroza@ucmerced.edu

The Journal of Chemical Physics
|August 17, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study presents a benchmark for non-covalent interactions in molecular crystals. The exchange-hole dipole moment (XDM) model significantly improves the accuracy of computed lattice energies and predicts crystal geometries effectively.

More Related Videos

From Molecules to Materials: Engineering New Ionic Liquid Crystals Through Halogen Bonding
06:44

From Molecules to Materials: Engineering New Ionic Liquid Crystals Through Halogen Bonding

Published on: March 24, 2018

Vibrational Spectra of a N719-Chromophore/Titania Interface from Empirical-Potential Molecular-Dynamics Simulation, Solvated by a Room Temperature Ionic Liquid
08:54

Vibrational Spectra of a N719-Chromophore/Titania Interface from Empirical-Potential Molecular-Dynamics Simulation, Solvated by a Room Temperature Ionic Liquid

Published on: January 25, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 19, 2026

Covalent Attachment of Single Molecules for AFM-based Force Spectroscopy
10:37

Covalent Attachment of Single Molecules for AFM-based Force Spectroscopy

Published on: March 16, 2020

From Molecules to Materials: Engineering New Ionic Liquid Crystals Through Halogen Bonding
06:44

From Molecules to Materials: Engineering New Ionic Liquid Crystals Through Halogen Bonding

Published on: March 24, 2018

Vibrational Spectra of a N719-Chromophore/Titania Interface from Empirical-Potential Molecular-Dynamics Simulation, Solvated by a Room Temperature Ionic Liquid
08:54

Vibrational Spectra of a N719-Chromophore/Titania Interface from Empirical-Potential Molecular-Dynamics Simulation, Solvated by a Room Temperature Ionic Liquid

Published on: January 25, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Solid-state chemistry
  • Computational materials science
  • Quantum chemistry

Background:

  • Accurate prediction of non-covalent interactions is crucial for understanding molecular solids.
  • Existing methods for calculating lattice energies and geometries have limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish a benchmark for evaluating computational methods for non-covalent interactions in molecular crystals.
  • To assess the performance of the exchange-hole dipole moment (XDM) model for solid-state applications.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a benchmark dataset using experimental sublimation enthalpies and geometries of 21 molecular crystals.
  • Careful accounting for thermal and zero-point effects.
  • Comparison of the XDM model with DFT-D2 and other non-local functionals.

Main Results:

  • The XDM model demonstrated a significant improvement in accuracy for computed lattice energies, with a mean absolute error of 4.8 kJ/mol.
  • The XDM model accurately predicted cell geometries, with deviations less than 2% from experimental results.
  • The XDM model roughly doubled the accuracy compared to DFT-D2 and non-local functionals.

Conclusions:

  • The XDM model is a highly promising approach for accurately describing dispersion interactions in solid-state applications.
  • The established benchmark provides a valuable resource for assessing future computational methods.
  • Accurate prediction of crystal properties is essential for materials design and discovery.