[Dutch national safety programme will not lead to a fifty per cent reduction in avoidable mortality in hospitals]

Marieke Zegers1, Hub Wollersheim

  • 1Universitair Medisch Centrum St. Radboud, afd. Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Nijmegen, the Netherlands. m.zegers@iq.umcn.nl

Progress in improving patient safety in hospitals has been frustratingly slow, for several reasons. There are, for example, few proven effective improvement interventions available. Evaluation of the effectiveness of safety interventions is complicated by the complexity and variability of these interventions due to local differences and preferences of care providers. In addition, a reduction in avoidable harm is difficult to measure due to the requirement for a large number of patients and lack of reliable instruments for measuring effectiveness. Also, problems experienced by care providers when implementing safety interventions are not being systematically addressed. For these reasons, the aim of the Dutch national safety programme in hospitals - to reduce the incidence of avoidable harm by 50% in 5 years - will not be feasible or measurable. It is necessary to identify effective safety interventions and to exchange experiences in successful implementation of these in order to support care providers in improving patient safety.

Related Concept Videos

Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures01:22

Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures

Essential infection prevention measures are based on the knowledge of the infection chain, the modes of transmission in healthcare settings, and the use of the best practices in all healthcare settings. Compulsory public reporting of healthcare-associated infection rates is needed to allow individuals and the community to make informed choices regarding selecting a healthcare facility.
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Obedience01:08

Obedience

According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation, obedience...
Respiratory Assessment: Purpose and Indications01:19

Respiratory Assessment: Purpose and Indications

Respiratory assessment is a cornerstone of nursing assessments, crucial for the early detection of patient deterioration. This evaluation transcends routine procedures, representing a critical skill nurses must master to ensure optimal patient care.
Objectives and Importance:
The primary goal of respiratory assessment is to evaluate patients at early risk of clinical deterioration. Since respiratory distress often precedes other signs of declining health, breathing patterns and sounds become a...