Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gene Flow02:39

Gene Flow

Gene flow is the transfer of genes among populations, resulting from either the dispersal of gametes or from the migration of individuals.
Fixed Action Patterns01:06

Fixed Action Patterns

A fixed action pattern (FAP) is a specific, hard-wired sequence of behaviors that occurs in response to an external stimulus, called a sign stimulus. The behavior is “fixed” because it is essentially unchangeable—proceeding similarly across individuals of a species every time it occurs.
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift01:09

Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift

In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).
Types of Genetic Transfer Between Organisms02:18

Types of Genetic Transfer Between Organisms

Genetic transfer occurs when genetic information is passed from one organism to another. It occurs via two mechanisms: vertical gene transfer and horizontal gene transfer. Vertical gene transfer occurs when genetic information is transferred from one generation to the next, which happens much more frequently than horizontal gene transfer. Both sexual and asexual reproduction are forms of vertical gene transfer, where one or more organisms pass some or all of their genome onto their progeny.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cohesion, order and information flow in the collective motion of mixed-species shoals.

Royal Society open science·2019
Same author

Consistency of fish-shoal social network structure under laboratory conditions.

Journal of fish biology·2018
Same author

Cultural niche construction and human evolution.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2017
Same author

Experimental evidence for the co-evolution of hominin tool-making teaching and language.

Nature communications·2015
Same author

Familiarity affects social network structure and discovery of prey patch locations in foraging stickleback shoals.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2014
Same author

Imitation learning in budgerigars: Dawson and Foss (1965) revisited.

Behavioural processes·2014

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 19, 2026

Microinjection for Transgenesis and Genome Editing in Threespine Sticklebacks
08:51

Microinjection for Transgenesis and Genome Editing in Threespine Sticklebacks

Published on: May 13, 2016

Information flow through threespine stickleback networks without social transmission.

N Atton1, W Hoppitt, M M Webster

  • 1Centre for Social Learning and Cognitive Evolution, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, Queen's Terrace, St Andrews KY16 9TS, UK. 258@st-andrews.ac.uk

Proceedings. Biological Sciences
|August 17, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Social networks influence how threespine sticklebacks discover foraging tasks, with discovery spreading faster in connected groups. However, social structure did not affect how quickly they solved tasks after discovery.

More Related Videos

Dissection and Flat-mounting of the Threespine Stickleback Branchial Skeleton
08:02

Dissection and Flat-mounting of the Threespine Stickleback Branchial Skeleton

Published on: May 7, 2016

Conditions Affecting Social Space in Drosophila melanogaster
08:04

Conditions Affecting Social Space in Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: November 5, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 19, 2026

Microinjection for Transgenesis and Genome Editing in Threespine Sticklebacks
08:51

Microinjection for Transgenesis and Genome Editing in Threespine Sticklebacks

Published on: May 13, 2016

Dissection and Flat-mounting of the Threespine Stickleback Branchial Skeleton
08:02

Dissection and Flat-mounting of the Threespine Stickleback Branchial Skeleton

Published on: May 7, 2016

Conditions Affecting Social Space in Drosophila melanogaster
08:04

Conditions Affecting Social Space in Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: November 5, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Animal behavior
  • Social learning
  • Network analysis

Background:

  • Social networks facilitate the spread of learned information and innovations in populations.
  • Understanding how social structure influences behavioral acquisition is crucial in evolutionary biology.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of social network structure in the discovery and solution of novel foraging tasks in threespine sticklebacks.
  • To apply network-based diffusion analysis (NBDA) to a natural animal system to understand behavioral acquisition mechanisms.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized shoals of threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteous aculeatus) presented with two identical foraging tasks.
  • Applied network-based diffusion analysis (NBDA) to track the order of task discovery and solution within social groups.
  • Analyzed the correlation between social network structure and the spread of task discovery and solution.

Main Results:

  • Found significant evidence of a social effect on the discovery of foraging tasks, with individuals discovering tasks faster when group members had already done so.
  • Demonstrated that the spread of task discovery was influenced by the social network structure of the groups.
  • Observed that social network structure did not reliably predict the spread of task solution, indicating discovery was socially influenced but solution latency was not.

Conclusions:

  • Social interactions influence the timing of novel behavior discovery but not necessarily the speed of problem-solving after discovery.
  • This study provides the first compelling evidence for an "untransmitted social effect" on learning, where social learning occurs without direct social transmission.
  • NBDA offers valuable insights into the mechanisms of behavior acquisition in natural systems, potentially revealing patterns missed by conventional statistical methods.