Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Facial Feedback Hypothesis01:24

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role of...
Association Areas of the Cortex01:21

Association Areas of the Cortex

Association areas are regions of the cerebral cortex that do not have a specific sensory or motor function. Instead, they integrate and interpret information from various sources to enable higher cognitive processes such as memory, learning, and decision-making. Some key association areas include the following:
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Parallel processing of distinct facial signals for the rapid evaluation of social agents.

iScience·2026
Same author

Increased susceptibility to the face pareidolia illusion in Visual Snow syndrome.

Perception·2025
Same author

Neural correlates reveal separate stages of spontaneous face perception.

Communications psychology·2025
Same author

Seeing the fours before the threes: investigating numerical signatures with hierarchical navon stimuli.

Psychological research·2025
Same author

Age-related differences in neural integrity are unrelated to prospective memory age effects.

Brain and cognition·2025
Same author

Toward ecological validity in expression discrimination: Forced-choice saccadic responses to posed and naturalistic faces.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2025
Same journal

Predictive models and parameter analysis for multiple tactile perceptions in skin-wet fabrics interface.

Perception·2026
Same journal

High-resolution kitsch by AI: Why society needs art, not more AI content.

Perception·2026
Same journal

Benchmarking spatial discrimination thresholds of two-frame motion defined forms compared to luminance and stereoscopic defined forms.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The effect of face masks on the perception of trustworthiness and competence in individuals with autistic traits.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The importance of external features for categorizing ethnicity: can Koreans identify Korean, Japanese, and Chinese faces?

Perception·2026
Same journal

Interoception, alexithymia, and motor congruency: Psychological drivers of body ownership in virtual reality.

Perception·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 19, 2026

Analyzing Neural Activity and Connectivity Using Intracranial EEG Data with SPM Software
06:50

Analyzing Neural Activity and Connectivity Using Intracranial EEG Data with SPM Software

Published on: October 30, 2018

A comparative study of face processing using scrambled faces.

Jessica Taubert1, David Aagten-Murphy, Lisa A Parr

  • 1Yerkes National Primate Research Centre, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA; jessica.taubert@uclouvain.be

Perception
|August 18, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Chimpanzees and rhesus monkeys process faces holistically, prioritizing global configuration over local features. However, chimpanzees focus on own-species faces, while monkeys show a more generalized face processing approach.

More Related Videos

Cortical Source Analysis of High-Density EEG Recordings in Children
09:32

Cortical Source Analysis of High-Density EEG Recordings in Children

Published on: June 30, 2014

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 19, 2026

Analyzing Neural Activity and Connectivity Using Intracranial EEG Data with SPM Software
06:50

Analyzing Neural Activity and Connectivity Using Intracranial EEG Data with SPM Software

Published on: October 30, 2018

Cortical Source Analysis of High-Density EEG Recordings in Children
09:32

Cortical Source Analysis of High-Density EEG Recordings in Children

Published on: June 30, 2014

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Area of Science:

  • Comparative psychology
  • Primate cognition
  • Neuroscience of vision

Background:

  • A common assumption is that closely related primate species with similar social interactions process faces identically.
  • This overlooks potentially significant interspecies differences in face perception.
  • Holistic face processing, where the face is perceived as a whole, is a key area of investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct a comparative study of holistic face processing in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
  • To investigate whether global precedence (processing the overall configuration before local features) is evident in both species.
  • To explore species-specific tuning in face processing, particularly concerning own-species versus other-species faces.

Main Methods:

  • Twelve subjects (six chimpanzees, six rhesus monkeys) were trained to discriminate between whole faces and feature-scrambled faces.
  • Two separate conditions were used: training with whole faces and training with feature-scrambled faces.
  • Generalization from learned configurations to novel configurations was assessed in both conditions.

Main Results:

  • Both chimpanzees and rhesus monkeys demonstrated global precedence, matching the global configuration of features over local ones.
  • Both species showed better generalization to novel configurations after training with feature-scrambled faces compared to whole faces.
  • This suggests easier access to local information when features are scrambled, supporting a holistic processing hypothesis.

Conclusions:

  • Both chimpanzees and rhesus monkeys exhibit holistic face processing.
  • Chimpanzee face processing appears tuned to own-species faces, whereas rhesus monkeys demonstrate a more generalized approach.
  • These findings highlight both shared and distinct mechanisms in primate face perception, warranting further research.