Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
There are critical reasons for not further delaying the implementation of the new ICD-10 coding system
13M Health Information System, Inc.
Insights
Delaying the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition (ICD-10-CM) implementation is costly and hinders healthcare. Adopting ICD-10-CM offers significant advantages over ICD-9-CM, improving diagnosis and procedure data.
Area of Science:
- Health Informatics
- Medical Coding Systems
- Healthcare Administration
Background:
- The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) proposed delaying the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition (ICD-10-CM) implementation to October 1, 2014.
- A contrasting viewpoint in Health Affairs argued against ICD-10-CM, citing expense, disruption, and limited clinical benefit.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the advantages of implementing ICD-10-CM and ICD-10-PCS.
- To counter arguments for delaying the ICD-10-CM transition.
- To highlight the cost-effectiveness and improved data quality of ICD-10-CM.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the proposed HHS rule for ICD-10-CM postponement.
- Critique of the arguments presented in the Health Affairs article.
- Comparative assessment of ICD-10-CM versus ICD-9-CM code sets.
Main Results:
- Implementation of ICD-10-CM and ICD-10-PCS offers substantial benefits over the current ICD-9-CM system.
- The assertion that ICD-10-CM provides limited clinical benefit is contested.
- Delayed implementation increases transition costs and perpetuates issues with imprecise medical data.
Conclusions:
- The transition to ICD-10-CM is essential and long overdue.
- Further delays in ICD-10-CM implementation will exacerbate costs and negative consequences.
- Adopting ICD-10-CM will yield significant cost benefits and improve healthcare data accuracy.
Abstract:
On April 17, 2012, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) published a rule proposing postponement of the implementation date for the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition diagnosis codes (ICD-10-CM) and procedure codes (ICD-10-PCS) by one year to October 1, 2014. An article in Health Affairs titled "There Are Important Reasons For Delaying the Implementation Of The New ICD-10 Coding System" asserts that the ICD-10-CM conversion will be "expensive, arduous, disruptive, and of limited direct clinical benefit." Contrary to the conclusions in this article, implementation of the ICD-10-CM and ICD-10-PCS code sets will provide major advantages over the existing ICD-9-CM code set. Implementation is long overdue and will provide significant cost benefits. Any further implementation delay will increase the cost of the transition as well as perpetuate the costs and negative consequences associated with continued reliance on imprecise diagnosis and procedure information.
Related Concept Videos
01:21Methods of Documentation III: PIE
01:26Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II
Timely documentation is crucial to ensure continuity of care for patients. Any delays in recording or reporting medical information can result in medical errors and even adverse patient outcomes. From medication administration to diagnostic test results, every detail must be accurately and promptly documented to provide the best possible care for patients.
01:15Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
01:18Introduction To Health Care Delivery System
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) advocates for a patient-centered, effective, safe, timely, equitable, and effective healthcare system. The National Priorities...
01:27Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
01:30Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.