Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

A New Method for Inducing a Depression-Like Behavior in Rats
Published on: February 22, 2018
Depression: the ambivalence of diagnosis
Renata Kokanovic1, Gillian Bendelow1, Brigid Philip1
1School of Political and Social Inquiry, Monash University, Melbourne, AustraliaSchool of Law Politics and Sociology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UKDepartment of Human Services, Melbourne, Australia.
Abstract:
The diagnosis of depression in the clinical context is extremely controversial and is subject to criticism of over-medicalisation and pharmaceuticalisation. Depression can be conceptualised across the entire spectrum of lay and medical belief, from the 'normal' highs and lows of the human condition to its inclusion in the dominant Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders classificatory system, as a form of serious mental illness. In this context, a better understanding of how people describe, experience, negotiate and participate in the process of diagnosis is needed. This article draws on qualitative interviews to explore lay accounts of being diagnosed with depression. The findings reveal that lay accounts of depression vacillate in and out of the medicalised discourse of depression, highlighting the limitations of the biomedical approach to diagnosis and treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Depressive Disorders: MDD and Dysthymia
Depressive Disorders: Etiology
Biological Factors in Depression
Biological predispositions significantly influence the risk of developing depressive disorders. Genetic studies highlight the role of variations in the serotonin transporter...
Depression: Overview
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects
Long-term Depression

